George Balanchine: The Ballet Maker by Robert Gottlieb


George Balanchine: The Ballet Maker
Title : George Balanchine: The Ballet Maker
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 0060750707
ISBN-10 : 9780060750701
Language : English
Format Type : Hardcover
Number of Pages : 224
Publication : First published October 26, 2004

Written by the gifted author, editor, and dance critic Robert Gottlieb, George Balanchine describes the life and art of the celebrated, revolutionary ballet choreographer. Here is a necessary and singular look at the life of one of the great figures of the 20th Century: the dynamic Balanchine, founder of The New York City Ballet, collaborator of Stravinsky, and inspiration to countless fans over the course of his long and storied career. George Balanchine is another engaging entry in the HarperCollins’ “Eminent Lives” series of biographies by distinguished authors on canonical figures.


George Balanchine: The Ballet Maker Reviews


  • Katerina

    Очень базовая биография Баланчина, из которой понятно только, что он был "безнадёжно гетеросексуален", имел привычку жениться на всех своих любовницах-балеринах, говорил по-английски с акцентом и поставил много балетов.

  • Emily

    This is a great place to start if you don't know very much about Balanchine. It's short, readable, and offers a high-level introduction to Balanchine's life and his contributions to ballet. Robert Gottlieb can get a little pretentious at times (as he keeps mentioning how he and other NYCB backers were more visionary than the dance critics writing about Balanchine's shows), but he does a nice job of distilling seventy years into 200 pages.

    Balanchine on the Danes: "The people here are shit. Nobody understands anything. Their heads are empty unless they see something resembling a sandwich."

    Balanchine on Colonel Wassily de Basil: "An octopus. A crooked octopus, and with bad taste."

    Balanchine on choreographing an elephant ballet: "If they are very young elephants, I will do it."

    His third wife on how Balanchine proposed: "'Maria,' he said, 'I would like you to become my wife.' I could barely speak, and the silence was awkward. I still called him Mr. Balanchine. Under the circumstances I thought it would be ludicrous."

    Balanchine on that marriage: "You know I loved Maria, great dancer, great woman, was like tiger. Being married to tiger very exciting, but after awhile, being married to tiger takes too much energy."

    Balanchine on my life philosophy: "I like to do things certain ways and I disagree with everybody but I don't even want to argue."

    Gottlieb mentions early on that life in a ballet company is exactly as dramatic, and with just as many romantic entanglements, as you might expect. I LOVE it. From Danilova throwing lapis lazuli earrings at Balanchine ("I had expected diamonds, so I threw them in his face") to Balanchine chasing Suzanne Farrell for years (she leaves the company because he won't give roles to her husband), this does not disappoint. So many of the episodes are so quickly related that I know there must be more. On to a larger biography!

  • Sarah

    A succinct survey of Balanchine, read just in time for Los Angeles Ballet's Balanchine Festival Gold (Balanchine Red is still running, fyi) which I saw with C and her dad. I can no longer tell what I learned from this book as opposed to the million other ballet memoirs I've read, but it does neatly encapsulate why Balanchine and his dancers have captured my fascination.

    Here is Balanchine on his own beginnings as a dancer: "I was, as a matter of fact, a wonderful dancer."

    Balanchine's philosophy on marriage: "I don't need a housewife. I need a nymph who fills the bedroom and floats out."

    Which translates into his philosophy on romantic ballets: "...the man always seeks and the woman flees."

    Here is second wife Alexandra Danilova on the lapis lazuli earrings he brought her: "I had been expecting diamonds, so I threw the earrings in his face."

    Third wife Maria Tallchief's friend Vera Brown, upon learning of Balanchine's proposal to Maria, which took place at a time when Maria was still calling him Mr. Balanchine: "George who?"

    Fourth wife Tanaquil LeClercq at their wedding: "Oh, my God, what Have I Let Myself IN FOR?"

    A fellow company member on Suzanne Farrell's return to NYCB, six years after Suzanne married another dancer, whom Balanchine promptly fired: "Suzanne's coming back is the best thing that's happened to us since she left."

    On the dual reasons for his love of Bach: "the mathematical precision of his music and, at the same time, its purely emotional and unfeigned striving for God."

    Balanchine, when asked if Stars and Stripes had a story: "Yes. The United States."

    Melodrama aside, the choreography we saw at Balanchine Gold was pretty wonderful. C and her dad liked La Sonnambula the best (which was originated by Tallchief as the Coquette and Danilova as the Sleepwalker! Balanchine also revived it for Allegra Kent during his Allegra Kent phase). My favorite piece from that night, the whole reason d'etre for seeing Gold and not Red, was Concerto Barocco, set to Bach's Violin Concerto in D Minor. The footwork got a bit lost but check out the YouTube video of LeClercq and Diana Adams, who portray the violins, personified. My next milestone is to go back to the source, NYCB, which I have never seen. ZOMG I just looked and NYCB will be performing Serenade in June!!

  • Tiffany

    A quick but nice overview of George Balanchine's life, works, and time with American Ballet, New York City Ballet, and School of American Ballet.

    The things I found most interesting were:
    - that Balanchine insisted on starting the school (School of American Ballet) before the company so he could train his dancers the way he wanted them to dance and use their bodies in his choreography, rather than having to un-train and re-train established dancers (That makes complete sense, and I'd never thought of that before.);
    - the way Balanchine worked *with* his dancers to come up with choreography that worked best for them. I like that in a leader. For one particular description of how Balanchine choreographed a piece on his dancers, Gottlieb quotes Ruthanna Boris as saying, "...he asked 'You can do like this? You say to me if is comfortable, not comfortable...You must say to me about if you can do en pointe. I am man--I do not go en pointe'" (79). She says that she and her fellow dancers "became participants in the process," and I appreciate that Balanchine wasn't so much of a prima donna choreographer that he would say, "This is how I want it. If you can't do it, too bad."
    - the examples of his analogies when explaining a movement to his dancers. There are quite a few listed toward the end of the book, but my favorites were how "he would want the foot at certain times to look almost boneless, not like a joint--'like an elephant's trunk,' he would say, 'the way an elephant picks a peanut off the floor'" and "'move out your hand as if you're asking for money'" (93-94);
    - what made some of his works revolutionary, and how he worked with the music and shapes. I think this would have been The Most Interesting Part of the Book for me, since 1) revolutionary ideas are usually interesting, especially when comparing them to pre-times, 2) I'm intrigued by shapes in choreography, and 3) the idea of "dancing the music" vs. "close to the music" vs. "in the music" (22-23) is one that I sometimes feel like I understand, but not fully and need explanation (and again, the way he worked with music was revolutionary for his time), but Gottlieb doesn't go into much detail in these aspects. Just when it feels like it's going to get good ("Ah! Balanchine was revolutionary! He worked with the music differently than other choreographers of the time did! Okay, here we go!"), Gottlieb just Stops. He left me wanting more! He left me wanting Anything! Like I said, this book is a *quick* overview of Balanchine.

  • Kathryn

    3.5 stars

    This was clearly written by someone who loved Balanchine and glosses over any difficult or problematic aspects of his life, but I liked visiting the ballet world. Made me want to go see dance...which hopefully I can again in the not too far off future.

  • Nancy Cook-senn

    Interesting bio

  • Christina

    I really enjoyed this book. This is a great, short introduction to the genius of George Balanchine, his life story and all his contributions to American ballet.
    I came in with basic knowledge of ballet, famous ballerinas and Balanchine, having seen a few of his ballets and being passionate about the art and the NYCB for a while now, so I was eager to learn more about him. This did the job, and I found myself actually smiling a lot, sometimes laughing outloud, as I was reading the many anecdotes, picturing him 'staging' ballets (as he would say), and realizing how incredible and gifted this man was.

    There were some great quotes, that I feel really captured him and made me like him even more. I admit I laughed out loud when Gottlieb talked about seeing Cranko's ballet with a patched-together Tchaikovsky score and Balanchine goes "You know why that one die?" (Cranko had died young of a hear attack) "Tchaikovsky up in heaven looked down and saw that ballet and went to God and said, 'Get that one!'"

    My favorite, however, was Martha Graham talking about Balanchine and his process of choreographing: "It's like watching light pass through a prism. The music passes through him, and in the same natural yet marvelous way that a prism refracts light, he refracts music into dance."

    It's a concise, articulated and sweet biography of the best ballet choreographer of the 20th century that I would recommend to anyone eager to know the man behind some of the most famous moder ballets out there. I'm now looking forward to reading bigger biographies, and some books from his dancers like Farrell and Tallchief, and to keep expanding my knowledge on ballet history.

  • Cherylann

    George Balanchine actually has a pretty fascinating life story, (Don’t worry Lucius, I’m not praising him as a choreographer) but this book was nearly impossible to get through because of the dull voice the author employed. Yes, this is a biography, thus non-fiction, but that does not automatically toss a book in the boring category. Certainly, a biographer’s job is different than that of a fiction writer. A biographer must stick to the solid facts, while a fiction writer is free to do whatever he or she pleases. The trueness of a biographer’s story does not excuse repetitive sentence structure and lack of voice. The duty of a biographer is to chronicle a person’s life, but it is also to write in such a way that people actually want to read it.

  • Bill

    fabulous, from gottlieb who was there. nice to mention in passing that you edited Catch-22; was editor in chief at the New Yorker; and worked to run the NYCB with Balanchine and Kirstein. Favorite anecdote: there's a techie smoking on the stage as he cleans up, Balanchine loses his temper for the only time in his life and screams at the man: "You don't smoke here! This is a stage! People DANCE here.

  • Heather

    This wasn't anything spectacular, but was a good no-frills summary of George Balanchine's life. It's only a couple hundred pages and though you could read something more lyrical and, let's face it, more juicy, this is a good way to get a quick snapshot in a short amount of time.

  • Angela

    Short and sweet.

  • Frank

    A very good short bio of the best ballet choreographer of the 20th century.