Title | : | Imperium in Imperio (Regenerations) |
Author | : | |
Rating | : | |
ISBN | : | 1952271584 |
ISBN-10 | : | 9781952271588 |
Language | : | English |
Format Type | : | Paperback |
Number of Pages | : | 232 |
Publication | : | First published January 1, 1899 |
Sutton E. Griggs’s first novel, originally published in 1899, paints a searing picture of the violent enforcement of disfranchisement and Jim Crow racial segregation. Based on events of the time, including US imperial policies, revolutionary movements, and racial protests, Imperium in Imperio introduces the fictional Belton Piedmont and Bernard Belgrave as “future leaders of their race” and uses these characters to make sense of the violence that marked the dawn of the twentieth century. Taking on contemporary battles over separatism and integration, Griggs’s novel continues to play a crucial role in understandings of Black politics. Edited and introduced by Tess Chakkalakal and Kenneth W. Warren, this new critical edition offers not only an incisive biographical and historical introduction to the novel and its author but also a wealth of references that make the events and characters of Griggs’s Imperium in Imperio , and its aftermath, accessible to readers today.
Imperium in Imperio (Regenerations) Reviews
-
With only a couple of exceptions, I've been very lucky in my pre-20th century reading choices this year, and I count myself beyond fortunate to have discovered this book, Imperium in Imperio, which was published in 1899. The author, Sutton E. Griggs was a Baptist pastor but very active in promoting and working toward civil rights and a goal of racial equality. Becoming increasingly frustrated by the lack of change, Griggs took to writing to espouse his cause and Imperium in Imperio is his first novel. Four more would follow, but it was this first effort that eventually led to Griggs' reputation as a Black nationalist. And considering when this book was published, it has so much relevance to our modern world that it's time to bring this author out of obscurity and into the light.
What little I'm willing to divulge of plot can be found at
my reading journal entry for this novel; the quick version is it takes a look at two very different African-American men from their early school years through their post-college careers and experiences, and how they were shaped by various forces in the white South.
While it's possible to read this just for story, this novel's brilliance is that it works under the surface on so many levels, providing much food for thought, as well as a large number of topics prompting me to further research for reading selections. While as one might imagine, a certain amount of melodrama comes into this story, it is such a great novel that it really deserves to be more widely read by anyone interested in American literature, in African-American literature, or in Black history. I think this is most certainly a milestone work, but while different, it's certainly not the first black political novel or the first novel advocating black nationalism as a number of people have claimed. There is an earlier, probably even more overlooked book called
Blake: or; The Huts of America, written by Martin R. Delany in 1861/1862 that should also be appreciated for its author's understanding of "the realization of the intensity and persistence of white racism," and for the actions taken by the characters in that novel. I just never know which book I open is going to be that unknown, obscure hidden gem -- along with Blake's novel, I've found it in Imperium in Imperio. It is important, it is powerful, and it is beyond relevant in our own time.
highly recommended. -
2/7/20
Read this for the diverse classics book club and what a jarring novel it was!
You can find me on
Youtube |
Instagram |
Twitter |
Tumblr |
Website |
The Storygraph -
A fascinating novel about a fictional secret shadow government created by African-Americans to protect their interests in the late 19th century. It tells the story of two men who went to the same primary school, how their lives diverged, and their participation in the secret government. I would have given the novel five stars because of its discussions of the issues of the day (and unfortunately the issues of today), but the author's writing style was not quite up to the highest standards. For example, we hear nothing of the secret government until about 70% through the book (but the personal stories of the two protagonists are still interesting), the novel is interspersed with lengthy speeches (which are again interesting), there is a lot of "tell" instead of "show." But in spite of that, I found the book to be an easy read that held my attention and worth picking up.
-
4.5 but goodreads doesn’t do half stars 😒 anyway the concept of this book is actually so interesting and really engaging and easy to follow. i will say the pacing leaves something to be desired at times but honestly i appreciated that bc i notoriously get bored easily! really interesting for me rn bc ive been thinking about the idea of rebellion v revolution, who is/should be at the forefront of revolutionary black struggle, black liberalism and racial uplift politics… yada yada yada! really cool
-
I thought this might be a chore to get through, but it turned out to be fascinating and surprisingly readable, especially as the pace of the story accelerates towards the end. It’s downright clumsy most of the time as fiction, but I’ll go with four stars anyway for overall interest, it goes barreling right past its own shortcomings.
Thanks to ICA Philadelphia for putting out a stack of cheaply printed free copies out on the gallery floor at their “Colored People Time” exhibit. -
antoinette sweetie i'm so sorry
-
According to the introduction to this edition, this is "the first political novel by a black American", which is reason enough to read it. The first half recounts the childhood and formative years of 2 black boys, Belton Piedmont and Bernard Belgrave. While the former is raised by his mother and owes his education to various benefactors who see his promise, the latter, whose father is in fact a white senator has a much easier path and goes to Harvard. Belton becomes a teacher, Bernard goes into politics. The chapters describing their early years are the liveliest in the book and are followed by what seems more like an obligatory interlude than an integral part of the design. Belton marries the beautiful Antoinette, but abandons her when she gives birth to a seemingly white child (who will later nonetheless prove to be his son and not the product of adultery). Bernard courts the equally gorgeous Viola but this girl commits suicide because she knows Bernard to be a mulatto and is convinced that miscegenation is catastrophic for black people and leads to their extermination (!!!). Thus her principled suicide is a testament to her nationalism. Only then does the author come to the description of the Imperium in Imperio of the title, which is a shadow government formed by black people with a view to altering their circumstances and achieving freedom. While Belton is one of the prime movers of the organization, for some reason he hands over the presidency to Bernard. The group considers various options to reach their goal, mass emigration to the Congo and insurrection among them. Eventually Belton suggests that the Imperium should reveal its existence to the white people and give them 4 years to make them equal citizens, after which period they would seize Texas and run it as a distinct entity. Bernard counters with a more agressive proposal which would involve embedding spies in the US Navy, hiding weapons all along the Texas border and enlisting the help of foreign powers to intimidate the US. These allies would gain the territory of Louisiana as the price of their support with this secessionist project. Belton, who finds this method of achieving independence vile and treasonous, lets his comrades execute him. In a coda, a man named Berl Trout explains why he felt compelled to betray Bernard's plot to the US authorities in order to prevent massive bloodshed and a blow to civilisation. Unleavened by the humor characteristic of the initial chapters, the second half of the novel is more interesting but also more rhetorical and didactic. It's odd that Belton and Bernard are presented throughout as equally admirable guys, and yet in Trout's last statement Bernard becomes "a man to be feared" because "born of distinguished parents, reared in luxury, gratified as to every whim, successful in every undertaking, idolized by the people, proud, brilliant, aspiring, deeming nothing impossible of achievement". Nothing had really prepared me to see Bernard denounced as an incipient tyrant. Ultimately this is a very flawed novel of ideas but worth reading for an early discussion of various paths to get black people their dues.
-
Review up soon.
-
A few pages into
Imperium in Imperio, I was sure I had made a bad choice for a utopian/dystopian literature class. I've known about this book by
Sutton Elbert Griggs for many years now, but somehow only this year I made a way to read and include it in my teaching. Even my son read it before I did! I vividly recall a long walk we took where he tried to give me a plot summary. I remained confused.
Suffice it to say that the plot is as convoluted and contrived as those of many 19th-century novels (this one was published in 1899). However, once I accepted that aspect of Griggs's tale of two black men, Bernard and Belton, and settled into their journeys, my travel with them was ok, if not always comfortable for a white woman reader. Although the two were schooled together early in their lives in Virginia, they take different paths after graduation, and then--not a surprise--they later reunite.
However, Bernard and Belton's reuniting in a secret, separatist society in Waco, Texas, and their differing views of how to create utopia, surprised and engaged me. The text, as others have noted, is a fantastic one for opening conversations about racial and racist views during Reconstruction and utopian and dystopian possibilities. I'm glad I read it. -
The book is problematic as hell, arguing, at times, that Africa is a nation filled only with ignorance and that it was only through the genorosity of white benefactors that African Americans can now enjoy educated lives, and also victim blames people who have been lynched (I wish I was joking or exaggerating). The book is also one of the most sexist books I have ever read, as women are used as props throughout and described in sexualized ways that strip them of any agency or autonomy. However, the book has some incredibly thoughtful moments about race and ultimately is doing something interesting with rhetorical appeals in the way it uses Western logics to argue for black liberation/nationalism. The writing is really sub par at times and I can't recommend this novel as a piece of literature, however, it is interesting as a historical artifact.
-
I read this book for my collegiate summer research. This book is interesting, and it certainly reflects the racial tension and oppression at the time. There's still a plethora of discussed topics that can relate to contemporary America, especially colorism. The book is, overall, a good read. While giving you a lot to examine academically, it's not an overly academic book and can be enjoyed as leisure. The only complaints I have about the book is (1) Belton's actions in the last couple chapters and (2) the lack of representation for the women in the book. They were used more as stepping stones and character development for the protagonists, Belton and Bernard, when they were just as interesting.
-
I read this book for my 19th Century African-American Literature class at Pitt. It was a very though-provoking novel that unpacks the issue of colorism in education. The two characters, both being black but one is lighter than the other, experience two different types of education, despite being in the same room. It got confusing at times, but the message was clear and the relationship between the boys was interesting.
-
Book #1 for my African American Academic Novels Class
3.5 rounded up to 4!! The plot of this book is really fast paced and spans an entire life time. It gets kind of strange at times, but it’s really funny. The social commentary I think is the point of this novel and it has a lot of really important things to say. A fun read for sure! -
Never heard of this book until I had to read it for a class. This is an amazing piece, skillfully written and breathtaking. Reading it made me think of Herman Merville's Benito Cereno. How both books do not fall in line with the readers expectations.......definitely worth the read!
-
This book follows the story behind of two boys that end up being part of a shadow government. It's from 1899 but I feel like it's still relevant, it talks about racism, the lack of opportunities and the violence that black folk suffer. The writing style is very friendly also and it's a short book.
-
Really, really interesting political document and historical artifact. As prose fiction it's quite messy but it was so fascinating that I really enjoyed reading it. Plus the comedy and melodrama keep things moving.
-
I loved the idea of this book and the questions it created, but was thoroughly put off by the author's evident misogyny, arrogance, and self-righteousness.
-
for a book from the early 20th century, this was great, easy to read and follow and pretty exciting. But also-- the politics were kind of eh at the end.
-
For a book published in 1899, this read really easily and I actually enjoyed it. Just the long paragraphs, man....c'mon
-
3.5
Well-written, interesting, and politically important. -
I tried to enjoy this book but I just absolutely couldn’t. Belton sucked, Bernard sucked almost just as much, and the writing was mediocre at best
-
Wew.
-
This book is a classic!