Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality by Michèle Lamont


Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality
Title : Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 0226468143
ISBN-10 : 9780226468143
Language : English
Format Type : Paperback
Number of Pages : 364
Publication : First published January 15, 1992

How are boundaries created between groups in society? And what do these boundaries have to do with social inequality?

In this pioneering collection of original essays, a group of leading scholars helps set the agenda for the sociology of culture by exploring the factors that push us to segregate and integrate and the institutional arrangements that shape classification systems. Each examines the power of culture to shape our everyday lives as clearly as does economics, and studies the dimensions along which boundaries are frequently drawn.

The essays cover four topic the institutionalization of cultural categories, from morality to popular culture; the exclusionary effects of high culture, from musical tastes to the role of art museums; the role of ethnicity and gender in shaping symbolic boundaries; and the role of democracy in creating inclusion and exclusion.

The contributors are Jeffrey Alexander, Nicola Beisel, Randall Collins, Diana Crane, Paul DiMaggio, Cynthia Fuchs Epstein, Joseph Gusfield, John R. Hall, David Halle, Richard A. Peterson, Albert Simkus, Alan Wolfe, and Vera Zolberg.


Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality Reviews


  • Titus Hjelm

    A collection of high-profile American sociologists mainly in dialogue with Pierre Bourdieu's theory of Distinction. John Hall's chapter is the leading theoretical dialogue in the book. The rest is, ultimately, disappointing. There are good chapters by Jeff Alexander and Alan Wolfe, but they have little to do with the rest of the book. Most chapters are American case studies in the sociology of art, with some discussion on gender thrown in. In other words, too disparate a collection despite the unifying topic of boundary.