Title | : | The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely |
Author | : | |
Rating | : | |
ISBN | : | 082233397X |
ISBN-10 | : | 9780822333975 |
Language | : | English |
Format Type | : | Paperback |
Number of Pages | : | 336 |
Publication | : | First published January 1, 2004 |
The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely Reviews
-
if you like this review i now have website:
www.michaelkamakana.com
251117: this is a later addition: i think i might read this all the way through, the reason i did not was it refers to thinkers i have not much read eg. Nietzsche, though she probably does bring it all together... and how else am i going to read? just in my personal 'bubble'? well maybe i will reread...
first review: it has taken me much reading to decide to read only part of the book that interests me, rather than each chapter or essay: so really this four only applies to the last third of the book on henri bergson, which i wanted to read about the 'virtual', but there is little here not previously read. more interesting is description of bergson's concept of originary division between matter and memory, present and past, instinct and intelligence, i had read this before but it is always already worthwhile to have understanding confirmed. this is good. that his thoughts have political ramifications i am impressed, that his thoughts could be useful in feminist philosophy, queer theory and so on is inspiring... -
the conclusion especially made me feel kind of ecstatic!
"History produces not only the forces of domination but also the forces of resistance that press up against and are often the objects of such domination. Which is another way of saying that history, the past, is larger than the present, and is the ever-growing and ongoing possibility of resistance to the present’s imposed values, the possibility of futures not unlike the present, futures that resist and transform what dominates the present" (237).
“The resources of the previously oppressed - of women under patriarchy, of slaves under slavery, of minorities under racism, colonialism, or nationalism, of workers under capitalism, and so on -are not lost or wiped out through the structures of domination that helped to define them: they are preserved somewhere, in the past itself, with effects and traces that can be animated in a number of different contexts and terms in the present" (240). -
"The most radical and deeply directed projects of feminist, queer, antiracist, and postcolonial struggles involve a welcoming of then settling of previous categories, identities, and strategies, challenging the limits of present divisions and conjunctions, and reveling in the uncontainability and unpredictability of the future."
-
I think she has some really interesting ideas, parallels between evolution/biology and how to understand society. The importance of diversity for the resiliency of a species is one particularly good concept, and I also like how she conceptualizes the present and people's ability to transform the future in unpredictable ways. I think this is a good philosophic work. However, I find this sort of writing style to be unnecessarily complicated- there is a way to use precise, well-defined language without using so much specialized jargon that your actual points are obscured. And for me, the scientific concepts didn't always translate properly to the philosophic ideas, she would mention political applications but not expand on them, and nothing gets pulled together into a cohesive argument or narrative. I did not actually quite finish this book (one more chapter left)n ... but I don't want to force myself to read it, so I'm letting it go.
Summary: I suspect it is a great work of philosophy, but it's just not for me. I want more science and more feminist/political/sociological application and less abstract theory.