Title | : | The Moral Argument |
Author | : | |
Rating | : | |
ISBN | : | 0190246367 |
ISBN-10 | : | 9780190246365 |
Format Type | : | Hardcover |
Number of Pages | : | 276 |
Publication | : | Published July 25, 2008 |
It gives students and scholars alike the chance to drill down into their ideas, contexts, and arguments. Only by a careful study of its history can we come to see its richness and the range of resources it offers.
The Moral Argument Reviews
-
Throughout this book, Baggett and Walls provide an historical survey of key thinkers in the world of moral apologetics. While technically this book is part of a series of books on the Moral Argument by these authors it is more than capable of standing on its own. And although this isn't the first in the series, I found it helpful in setting the stage for understanding the depth of the moral arguments.
Each chapter follows a similar format
Baggett and Walls begin by introducing a significant thinker in the world of moral apologetics, highlighting their academic upbringing and eventual career achievements. From there, they dig into the unique contributions that thinker made moral arguments. This discussion involves not just summarizing key ideas but also assessing objections raised by critics. It's clear that while each thinker has both strengths and weaknesses, each thinker made significant contributions to the discussion of moral apologetics.
Admittedly, I haven't spent a lot of time engaging with moral arguments. Apologists often present simplified versions that lack depth and skeptics often just dismiss them altogether without bothering to engage much at all. In contrast, this book was refreshing. Baggett and Walls reveal how multifaceted moral arguments have been throughout history and continue to be in recent scholarship. So if you've found moral arguments to be shallow or uninteresting, this book will surely challenge that impression.
Overall I enjoyed this book. Reading it made me want to study moral apologetics in greater detail despite the fact that I gravitate more toward science-related discussions. So if you're at all interested in moral apologetics, this book is a must read. And if you're not interested in moral apologetics, you still should read this book because it might reveal a side of the discussion that you haven't seen before. And that side will likely challenge your assumptions about the discussion. One thing is for sure, I look forward to reading the other books in the series by Baggett and Walls.