One Earth, One Humanity vs. the 1% by Vandana Shiva


One Earth, One Humanity vs. the 1%
Title : One Earth, One Humanity vs. the 1%
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 1629636509
ISBN-10 : 9781629636504
Format Type : Hardcover
Number of Pages : 176
Publication : First published January 1, 2018

Dr. Vandana Shiva’s most radical and important ideas are represented in lucid form in this essential primer for those who wish to understand the forces that threaten our planet. Her vision of “one earth, one humanity” and its scientific and cultural roots are explained in depth; the monopolistic economic machinations of the 1% are exposed; the genetic manipulations of Monsanto and its Nazi roots are uncovered; and “philanthropists” such as Bill Gates are exposed as the new Robber Barons. Vandana Shiva’s struggles on the streets of Seattle and Cancun and in homes and farms across the world have yielded a set of principles based on inclusion, nonviolence, reclaiming the commons, and freely sharing the earth’s resources. These ideals, which she calls “earth democracy,” serve as an urgent call to peace and as the basis for a just and sustainable future. Unafraid to confront authority and name names, this slim book exposes the global elite, uncovering their links to the rising tide of fundamentalism, violence against women, and planetary death.


One Earth, One Humanity vs. the 1% Reviews


  • Nico Jones

    Could not get through it. Many points she makes are true, but the way she interprets them are purely false.

    For example, Nitrates were made as a weapon during the wars and later have been used to allow for agriculture that is feeding the world (which she explains)... but an illogical conclusion would be to say that Bill Gates is propagating these War Machines to make the world believe that Western Knowledge works and that the ancient wisdom of farmers (undernourished, I hasten to add) is not being respected - even though, she argues, they have been able to "preserve the ecosystem for thousands of years", her point exactly.

  • JC

    I had a chance to watch Shiva talk while a student at Guelph. I believe Shiva completed her PhD at Guelph a number of decades ago, so it was neat to watch her speak there, especially at Canada's main agricultural post-secondary institution that has lecture halls named after food and agro-corporations.

    This book is a fantastic dismantling of the philanthropy myth. Why so many continue to defend philanthropic billionaires is beyond me. Even criticisms I’ve seen of this book gravitate towards Shiva’s alleged exaggeration regarding billionaires and some sort of misplaced cynicism of hers. I don’t know how people arrive at such places. I suppose this is a deeply religious issue for me. I see billionaire hacks like Richard Branson firing their way through space, at the precipice of a new form of intergalactic privatization, and I see this disturbing lauding of Mammon and wealth. I wonder when he and his ilk will start investing money to start working on the newest frontier of philanthropy: figuring out how to fit a camel through the eye of a needle. All billionaires are evil, and I think if you need it spelled out a little more systematically, Shiva along with her daughter show their readers why they make such assertions. The decayed Capital of billionaires will one day testify against them and eat their flesh like fire. The wages they have expropriated from their workers will cry out against them. They are living on earth in luxury and self-indulgence, fattening themselves in the day of slaughter. Alright then, now that I’m finished paraphrasing the revolutionary terror of James 5, I’ll move on, lol.

    So Shiva articulates the way the billionaire class operate in the world of philanthropy:

    “The One Economy being built by Bill Gates and Warren Buffett and Big Money, is evidenced by the fact that the largest investment made by the Gates Foundation Trust, worth $11.8 billion in 2014, is in the US conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway, whose Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffett—a trustee of the Gates Foundation—has donated billions to the Foundation Trust. (The BMGF Trust manages ‘the investment assets and transfer[s] proceeds to the Foundation as necessary to achieve the foundation’s charitable goals’. The Trust’s biggest investment stakes are in Berkshire Hathaway.) Bill Gates also serves as a board member of Berkshire Hathaway which has 60 subsidiaries, mainly US-based, in sectors including agriculture, energy, retail, media, transportation, electronics, chemicals, jewellery, furniture and insurance. In our world this would qualify as conflict of interest, but in the world of Big Money it is ‘innovation’.

    How did Buffett get so ‘rich’? Warren Buffett did not become rich with Berkshire Hathaway; he accumulated wealth through the Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO). He sold insurance to government employees, people who do not get to choose their insurance terms and conditions, its their employer who picks from among the choices that Buffett decides to offer. At a price of his choosing. Signed off by the regulator and paid for by the employee. A part of every government salary, automatically diverted as deductable insurance payment into Buffett’s bank—an efficient, self-sustaining model of cash flow to Buffett-Land.”

    “We tell the story of the new colonisation by the 1% through the journey of Bill Gates who, in August 2017 had $89 billion in the bank, and has been the richest man in the world since 2013. In 2015, he was worth $81.6 billion which was nearly $6 billion more than the $76 billion he had in March 2014, and the $76 billion was $9 billion more than he was worth in March 2013. He is among the five men who control as much wealth as 50 per cent of humanity. Gates knows how to create and run the money machine.

    While presenting himself as a philanthropist who gives away his money, Gates has a personal investment company, Cascade Investment LLC, funded solely by himself and run by Michael Larson, one of the most powerful men in US wealth management. Gates now has vast holdings in real estate and non-tech companies, like the Canadian National Railway Co.; AutoNation Inc., an American automotive retailer; and Republic Services Inc., a waste management company. He is making more money than he is giving away.

    We tell the story of Big Wealth and Big Money in our times by focusing on Gates and his role in destroying self-organsation in nature and society to engineer monopolies through mastery, conquest, invasion and dictatorship by the tools he owns and controls for rent collection, which in his double-speak, he calls ‘innovation’.

    While he has been central to the establishment of the new civilising mission of technology as a religion, Gates himelf did not invent anything. Microsoft Basic is based on BASIC (an acronym for Beginner’s All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code), designed in 1964 by John G. Kemeny and Thomas E. Kurtz at Dartmouth College (New Hampshire, USA) to make it easy for non-science, non-math students to use computers. Before the introduction of BASIC, computers required the writing of custom software which only scientists and mathematicians could do. Microsoft BASIC (MBASIC) became one of the leading applications in the world, but even the operating systems were developed by others. Gates made his billions through patent monopolies, by enclosing the commons of software. The open source software movement began as a response to the patent monopoly; the free software movement is to patented propriety software what our seed freedom movement is to seeds.

    Gates is now using his economic power to expand his patent empire to the living world, to enclose the biological and knowledge commons through patenting and biopiracy. He is trying to control the seed by controlling the gene banks where the biodiversity of the world is stored; he is trying to pirate and patent climate resilient crops evolved by farmers; he is trying to use digital tools to take genomic patents on biodiversity and agriculture; he is trying to enclose our food commons by imposing GMO foods…

    Whereas with the bonus of tax free trade on software, the Microsoft monopoly went global, now, with DivSeek, CRISPR and the genetically engineered mosquitoes in Florida, Gates wants to control our food, our diversity and our heritage. And to top it all, he is financing a most unscientific and irresponsible experiment, that of geoengineering.”

    There are a few things worth mentioning about this book. While Shiva is a socialist, she is a particular sort of eco-feminist that the Maoist Anuradha Ghandy (I think) rightly criticized as romanticizing older feudal forms of agrarianism. I don’t think Shiva really does any of that in this book, but I do think she views GMOs differently than most modernist Marxists. The main issue is the way GMO research is so tightly intertwined with the interests of capital that it’s difficult to properly evaluate particular research outcomes. Although this is true of so many aspects of scientific research, and propagandizing certainly has not escaped science under socialism so that is still something to flag. I think Shiva is more dismissive of some GMO technology than I am now, although I used to share her views. She obviously knows more about the science than most people (especially me). Shiva does focus on the issues of enclosure and the coercive aspects of biotechnology companies and I think that should always be the focus of anti-GMO activism. It is the science at the hands of capital that makes it disconcerting.

    Secondly, Shiva is obviously influenced by Gandhi enormously. The Met screens a different free opera everyday, which I sometimes watch. Around the time I was finishing up this book, they screened Philip Glass’s Satyagraha. I maybe watched about 40% of it before falling asleep, and never did get around to finishing it. I wouldn’t recommend it. I don’t know how a production like that would go over today. Opera has been so white for so long, how does one stage something like Satyagraha in New York – an Opera in Sanskrit focused on the life of Gandhi. I have no idea. I felt embarrassed watching it haha. Anyway, many people I admire greatly, like MLK, are also very taken by Gandhi. I think there has been a reckoning lately over the racist and sexist legacy of Gandhi’s life. I think one of the most illuminating reflections on this phenomenon is
    a piece Vijay Prashad wrote in The Print India where he said:

    “All these debates are important. No person is saintly. No one should be worshipped. More important than Gandhi were the freedom movement in India and the freedom movement in South Africa and the freedom movement in the United States and elsewhere. Leaders – such as Gandhi – play a key role in these movements, but they do not define them. It would be a pity if in this auto-da-fé of Gandhi’s’ reputation, the complexity of his role is forgotten and the movements that he inspired are set aside. The myth is dangerous if it obscures the important voices that tried to be heard during Gandhi’s lifetime, notably the people who were not content with ‘flag nationalism’, with the replacement of the British flag with the flag of the Indian bourgeoisie.”

    Shiva also draws a lot on notions autopoesis and self-organization, which is related to the anti-colonial ideology of Gandhi. I’ve heard Donna Haraway’s criticisms of autopoesis but haven’t taken the time to evaluate them in this context. That would be an interesting exercise.

    Finally, I think Shiva makes very important connections between the Nazis and the modern chemical industry:

    “Standard Oil and IG Farben founded a company, Standard IG Farben in 1927, and they exchanged patents to control economies on both sides of the Atlantic.4 They joined hands to open up the Auschwitz concentration camp to produce artificial rubber and synthetic gasoline from coal. They provided the capital and technologies, while Hitler provided the labour of the concentration camp.5
    Monsanto and Bayer, who are now merging, have a long history. They made explosives and lethally poisonous gases using shared technologies and sold them to both sides, the Allied and the Axis Powers, during the world wars. Bayer was then a part of IG Farben, Hitler’s economic power and pre-war Germany’s highest foreign exchange earner, with offices in the United States and Switzerland. IG Farben was also a foreign intelligence operation. Hermann Schmitz was the President of the company, his nephew Max Ilgner a director, while Ilgner’s brother, Rudolph, handled the New York arm of the VOWI Network, as Vice President of Chemnyco. VOWI was a Nazi foreign intelligence operation. Chemnyco was supported by a retainer fee from IG Farben and it handled the U.S. expenses of the company. The American company was controlled by IG Farben and was a valuable source of information. It was investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice during the war.

    Paul Warburg, the brother of Max Warburg, a member of Farben Aufsichtsrat (supervisory board), founded the Federal Reserve System in the United States. The central banking system was created on December 23, 1918, with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act. Walburg, in 1907, had published, ‘A plan for a Modified Central Bank’ in The New York Times Financial Review, which contributed to the creation of the Federal Reserve System.9 Max Warburg and Hermann Schmitz were the central players in the Farben empire. Other ‘guiding hands’ of the FarbenVorstand (executive board) included Carl Bosch, Fritz ter Meer, Kurt Oppenheim and Georg von Schnitzler; each one of them was declared a war criminal after World War II, with the exception of Paul Warburg.

    Monsanto and Bayer had a joint venture, MOBAY, in 1954 that was part of the Toxic Cartel of IG Farben. Controlling stakes in both corporations were with the same private equity firms. Their expertise was acquired in the arena of war. Monsanto entered into a partnership with IG Farben, Hitler’s supplier of Zyklon-B, a cyanide based pesticide used in concentration camps during the Holocaust; it was used as evidence in the Nuremberg trials, which found Farben and its partners, which included Bayer, BASF and Hoechst (Aventis), guilty of war crimes.

    MOBAY supplied the ingredients for Agent Orange during the Vietnam War (1961-71), too; 20 million gallons of MOBAY defoliants and herbicides were sprayed over South Vietnam. Monsanto and Bayer’s cross-licensed Agent Orange resistance has also been cross-developed for decades. While wars were fought, lives were lost, and countries were carved into holy lands—with artificial boundaries that suit colonisation and resource grab—the two corporations sold chemicals as bombs and poisons.”

    This was a very illuminating book and of course Shiva has an axe to grind, but at least she’s clear about it and the reader has no doubts which side she’s on. She’s most definitely not on the side of the ruling class.

    postscript: a note to myself: there are some really interesting comments Shiva makes with respect to rivers:
    “Recently, the High Court of Uttarakhand in India ruled that Himalayan mountain ranges, glaciers, rivers, streams, rivulets, lakes, jungles, the air, forests, meadows, dales, wetlands, grasslands and springs are living beings and legal entities with rights.9 The legislature in Madhya Pradesh recognised the personhood of the Narmada river in May 2017 to ensure ‘conservation of aquatic biodiversity’."

    and also floods and logging:
    “While pursuing my PhD, I became involved as a volunteer in the Chipko movement, a nonviolent, peaceful response to the large-scale deforestation that was taking place in the Garhwal Himalaya by peasant women from the region, who came out in defence of the forests. Chipko means ‘to hug’, ‘to embrace’. Women declared that they would hug the trees to protect them—loggers would have to kill them before they felled the trees.

    Logging had led to landslides and floods, and to the scarcity of water, fodder and fuel. Since women service these basic needs, scarcity meant longer walks for collecting water and firewood, and a heavier burden to bear. Women knew that the real value of forests was not the timber from a dead tree, but springs and streams, food for their cattle and fuel for their hearths. The folk songs of that period said,

    These beautiful oaks and rhododendrons,
    They give us cool water.
    Don’t cut these trees,
    We have to keep them alive.

    It took the 1978 Uttarkashi disaster, which created floods all the way to Calcutta in Bengal, for the Indian government to recognise that the women were right because the expenditure on flood relief..."

  • Shan

    Inserisco media, recensione a dopo
    image: description
    Monsanto invasion
    image: description
    Somministrazione massiva dei pesticidi
    image: description
    Monocolture
    image: description
    Monocolture

  • Noel نوال  Ali

    “The business of grabbing and money-making, through a violent extractive economy that the 1% have built, is burdening the earth and humanity with unbearable and non-sustainable costs, and has brought us to the brink of extinction. We do not have to escape from the earth; we have to escape from the illusions that enslave our minds and make extinction look inevitable.”
    ~Vandana Shiva, Oneness vs The 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom

    This book taught me way more than my white-washed bullshit conservation biology class that blamed BIPOC and countries recovering from colonialism for global warming and earth's demise. As the only woman of color, let alone one of only two people of color, in that class I constantly had to argue points about environmental colonialism and apartheid when the professor and my classmates wanted to pin all of the blame for our world's current environmental state on trafficked people enslaved on shark-finning boats.
    I really respect Vandana Shiva for the way she unapologetically stands for the earth, farmers, ecological and agricultural feminism, and indigenous lives with fully grounded strength. She is not afraid to speak up against corrupt billionaires like Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk to name a few who have generated their wealth through the exploitation of human labor, natural resources, and the environment. These billionaires that are part of the 1% that possesses half of the world's wealth contribute to so much of the Earth's pollution through their corporations/factories/natural resource harvesting yet they greenwash the crap out of the narratives they present to the world. Tell me why the world's 3rd richest man (Bill Gates) owns the most land in America including a majority of Sioux territory as well as the land of other First Nations tribes?
    The people that grow the most produce in the world tend to be poverty-stricken because of how the global economy is set up. They possess the knowledge to grow food for the globe yet the corporations they slave away for overwork them for wages too scarce to feed their families with and that is everything that's wrong with our world. "Oneness versus the 1%" is an excellent book that delves into environmental colonialism, exploitation of natural resources, attacks on indigenous farmers by the 1%, how the 1% got exponentially richer during a global pandemic while the rest of the world suffered while filling the billionaires' wallets, Monsanto, how the corporations that created the gases used in the Holocaust concentration camps and Napalm used in Vietnam never faced consequences and play a large role in global agriculture today, the negligence of prioritizing colonizing Mars due to selfish nihilism when we could invest and work to helping our planet heal and repair, the necessity of oneness in our world, and so much more. I highly recommend this book to everyone; it's highly important and timely.

  • Rhys

    A book with a lot of passion and perspective.

    Her evaluation of 'philanthrocapitalism' was prescient, as was her well-articulated evaluation of 'grabbing' - grabbing land, grabbing patents on indigenous seeds and grabbing the well-being of the 99% by converting it into value-accumulation.

    "In the face of the hyper anthropocentrism and hyper greed of the 1%, which is exterminating the diversity of species, and rendering the 99% disposable, our power for change comes from being part of the earth family. In the awareness that we are one with the earth and all her beings we become aware that we are one as humanity. The web of life unites us. The power of Big Money and its political machine divides us by locking us in narrow, fragmented, constructed identities, creating the illusion of our separation from the earth, and through that separation, the illusion that it is the money machine that runs our lives. That we will have no food without the Monsantos and Cargills, no water without the Cokes and the Pepsis, no health without Big Pharma, no friends without Facebook, no communication without Twitter, no money without Big Banks, no energy without Big Oil, no knowledge without Big Data" (p.195).

  • Will Hansen

    Shiva mounts a strong attack against the reductionist logic of Trans-National Corporations, who continue to pollute our environment, destroy agricultural biodiversity and patent the seeds farmers in India and around the world have been planting for generations.

  • Sophie McKeand

    Vandana Shiva is an intellectual force to be reckoned with. Explosive in her delivery and meticulous in her thinking. A must read.

  • Matara Scott

    cant wait to meet vandana shiva !! what an amazing woman

  • Nerea

    Very dense and intelligent book. I got lost and it was hard to read. Maybe a little too smart for me. Thankyou for the book and hope I can understand and retain more the next time I read.

  • Bruno Sbille

    Très intéressant ce livre, de plus d'une personnalité que j'adore.

    Le livre reprend pendant une grande partie comment la pensée mécaniste. Produire plus en ne considérant pas la planète dans son ensemble a conquis notre monde. Elle donne aussi pas mal d'exemples sur comment une minorité des humains s'approprie toutes les richesses et tout le pouvoir.

    C'est un livre d'autant plus intéressant qu'il a été publié en 2018, soit avant la crise du covid-19. Elle fait notamment un portrait peu reluisant de Bill Gates et de sa fondation. Ce qui prend tout son sens à l'époque actuelle.

    Ensuite à la fin du livre elle propose une approche pour sortir de cet état de fait.

    Si je devais donner une critique à ce livre ce serait au niveau de l'équilibre. Sur 180 pages 150 sont dédiées à la description du problème et 30 à la solution. J'aurais aimé plus du côté solution.
    Après mon avis est sans dû au fait que je connaissais déjà beaucoup de choses sur la description du problème (biodiversité, Monsanto etc.) via des documentaires que j'ai pu voir.

    Chouette lecture donc !

  • Luci

    Read the 2020 updated version. Explores interesting concepts and full of interesting data about agriculture amd the economics of the elite. But most of Shiva's solutions are idealistic and not fully formed.

  • Marianela

    Una terrible traducción pobre Vandana si tu supieras

  • Majo

    Very interesting topic but a little hard to read.

  • Matt Trimble

    It appears that I have an updated version, printed by Chelsea Green 2020. One of the most important books I've ever read, giving deep insight to not only the plight of globalism and its catastrophic consequences for Indian farmers, but for the rest of us through Big Agriculture and the elites genetic experiments run amok.
    I like attention called to actual numbers concerning investments and stakes in companies; it makes "following the money" a lot easier.

    I've always tried to avoid GMOs but after reading this, I will do better than try. I will also pay even closer attention to how and what I consume in general. The only complaint I have is I feel there is an overfocus on women- women are just as much to blame for all of this society as women, but I also try to consider that there is probably a stark cultural difference. I'm sure Indian women have much different priorities than Western women.

  • Ana Silva

    Everybody should read this, really.
    We need to be aware of what’s happening in our world and how we are losing our freedom and our connection with nature thru the ideas and actions of the 1%
    There is a lot of things that we kinda imagine but we are far from knowing it.
    The 15 companies that rule the world will fucks us over in no time, and the only solution is to unite, follow the nature’s rhythm and try more and more to consume local and small
    Try to eat organic and have a small little pot with dirt and vegetables, doesn’t matter if you don’t have a garden, please just try it in your window.
    They will kill us, our farmers and our Mother Earth

  • Scott Squires

    I’m not sure what to say about this book. It raises a truck full of heinous activities by Gates et al. Vandana Shiva has a wonderful outlook on life and how we can interact more respectfully and lovingly and in tune with the nature of creation. I think the book could perhaps be a little longer; analysing in more depth some of the issues she exposes/highlights. It could also do with better editing and proofreading. She overcomplicates some of her language/ word choice, making it a less accessible read; which is a shame, as it should be more widely read.

  • Tammy

    I would have given this book 5 stars, given how much I learned and the importance of that information. The book is full of facts and ideas that make me want to share with others. As I read, I often found myself wondering why this was the first time I've heard about what the author was reporting; this is stuff everyone should know about. Most of it is very dire, yet there is hope, and I closed the book feeling that I can participate in realizing that hope. I had to take a star away from my rating because the text is very poorly edited.

  • Dhanya Jothimani

    Main focus is on globalization and its effect on agriculture in many developing countries, how 1% of wealthier population drive their business and influence (almost) everything in business world.

    While I agree with some of the ideas and thoughts presented by Vandana Shiva in this book but she seems to interpret many things using the idea "correlation" leads to "causation". This makes it difficult to read and agree with the conclusion she arrives at.

    (This book was recommended to me and gifted by one of my close friends)

  • Scoots

    3.5 stars

    "The agrochemical and biotech industry is using the climate resilient crops bred by farmers for their genome mapping, claiming the farmer-bred traits as inventions through patents. But this is not breeding, it is piracy, biopiracy. And this is how the Gates Foundation redefines the biopiracy of flood-tolerant rice from Indian farmers - an 'innovation' funded by Gates.

    Corporations have taken out more than 1,500 climate resilient patents on crops. In 2014, India's patent office rejected Monsanto's application for climate-resilient traits of cold tolerance, salt tolerance and drought tolerance in crop varieties evolved by farmers over millennia, through applying their knowledge of breeding. While the spin is that these traits are being genetically engineered, the reality is that its biopiracy."

  • Yvette

    Finished a paperback version with a slightly different title, 'Oneness Vs the 1%'.
    Vandana Shiva is an activist concerned with globalisation and how corporate companies are influencing the lives of Indian farmers. The consequences have far-reaching effects. A useful read if this is all completely new to you, about what is really going on in the world.
    I've seen her speaking on Youtube and she is a voice worth following.

  • Laure

    Des données et théories qui soutiennent les mouvements écologiste et éco-féministe: ce livre devrait avoir tout pour plaire. Mais... le livre est mal découpé, le style est plus que poussif, et chaque chapitre donnait l'impression qu'il aurait pu être contenu (et plus lisible) en un article de blog. J'étais pleine d'enthousiasme en le commençant et je n'ai pas pu le finir...

  • Scott Lichtenstein

    A necessary voice in a time ‘where human extinction is on a precise’(her words). A must read for anyone wanting to uncover the sources of ecoside. If you’re a short term, bottom-line thinking supporter you won’t like this book but if you’re interested in an alternative to the dominant discourse this is a must.

  • Vinnie

    Alarming book on food imperialism and how the global industrial complex hurts ecology and its diversity. Also 1% does philanthropy but they also have investments in gathering data, gmo foods and modifying the policy of countries which can hurt their ecology, freedoms and knowledge acquired over thousands of years. The end result is legal oppression and control of resources.

    Bottom line - Eat local, seasonal, organic and traditional. Invest in conscious capitalism, do all round research of billionaire philanthropy.

    Don’t invest in index funds that fund extremely imperialistic companies.

    Must read for our generation.

    On coronavirus when Bill gates called it as a world war which pits humanity against the virus.



    “The pandemic is a consequence of war. A war against life. The mechanical mind connected to the money machine of extraction has created the illusion of humans as separate from nature, and nature as dead, inert raw material to be exploited. But, in fact, we are part of the biome. And we are part of the virome. The biome and the virome are us, when we wage wars on biodiversity - the forests, farms, our guts, we wage war on ourselves”

    Excerpt from: "Oneness vs. the 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom" by Vandana Shiva. Scribd.
    This material may be protected by copyright.

    Read this book on Scribd:
    https://www.scribd.com/book/475571260