| Title | : | Lord of the Dead |
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | |
| ISBN | : | 0671024116 |
| ISBN-10 | : | 9780671024116 |
| Language | : | English |
| Format Type | : | Paperback |
| Number of Pages | : | 336 |
| Publication | : | First published January 1, 1995 |
Traveling in the mountains of Greece, Byron falls under the spell of a mysterious fugitive slave, whose pale, slim body arouses his lust. Utterly entranced, his fate is sealed. The supreme sensualist embarks on a life of adventure—that of the world's most formidable vampire.
Chosen to enjoy powers beyond those any vampire has ever known, Byron enters a dark, intoxicating world of long-lost secrets, ancient arts, and scorching excesses of evil. He drinks deeply of terror and sex. But his diversions, delicious and cruel, are also his torment: an all-consuming thirst damning all those he loves...
Lord of the Dead Reviews
-
i can't help it, i love byron. i have about 30 books here that fictionalize his life and work and discourtesies. and most of them look like cheap romance novels, but i love that clubfooted bastard even when they are bad. and this one is bad. byron as a vampire?? how could this story go off the tracks, you wonder?? well, it does. pretty spectacularly. i own the sequel too, and i will read it because i cannot resist! i'm just glad i can read pretty quickly, so i am able to indulge myself these little diversions from good taste and sensible reading. someday soon i will embark upon my byronathon and read all these old mass markets with their blue-tinted pages and see if any of them deserve to be back in print, or if it was meant to protect us all...
come to my blog! -
What a bizarre book! I had it marked as horror while on my tbr shelf. After reading it, I unclicked the horror box and selected gothic. It's truly a gothic story, very similar I'm sure to Anne Rices work. The entire book is a narrative of a past life and history. While this can grow annoying, at least the life led was interesting.
I was bitterly disappointed and aggrieved by something that happened when Bryon was made Vampire, but was happy the author resolved this a bit in the end with a surprise visit. I wish it would have worked out the other way though without misunderstanding.
There were a lot of changes to the classic vampire story here but I don't wish to say them as that would spoil the surprise of the story as Byron himself finds out the true horror of being undead.
Byron by himself was an okay sort pre-vamp, but due to his nature and just him in general he's not the greatest type of person. How truly awful it would be to live an existence as they did. Not an amazing piece of literature, but still a good piece of work for someone wanting a different sort of tortured vampire story. When I say tortured I don't mean innocent vampires trying to play nice, they are cruel and matter of fact in this book. The tortured element is just part of the the horrible existence of immortality for this piece.
I'm not familiar with Byron's work and this is the first piece of fiction I've read about the author. Really dug the writer's style and it's clear he has talent with the word. -
Nachdem mir die Geschichte zu lange in Byrons Vergangenheit und fremden Ländern verweilte, während ich sehnsüchtig darauf wartete, dass die Handlung wieder in das London der Gegenwart wechselt, habe ich nur noch quergelesen.
Daher mag ich gar keine Bewertung abgeben, zu oberflächlich meine Lektüre. -
Action scenes with alot of boring scenes in between (in my opinion). It's very similar to the format of Interview With the Vampire, and brings nothing really new to the genre. I wasn't interested in the main character (Byron), so I really didn't care what happened to him. Maybe it picks up in the second half, but I'm not sticking around to find out. This just wasn't for me.
-
One of two very cleverly done vampire books. Two of my favorites actually. He manages to combine some notable people and fictional characters in history in a totally believable way and also creates more of a place for John Polidori than he usually manages to have. It was well done, richly textured and I might have to read one again today now that I am talking about it.
:) -
L'anemia del revenant
Tom Holland scrive un romanzo interessante e ambizioso, che avrebbe un sapore più marcato, se non lo avessero preceduto l'immortale romanzo di Bram Stoker e, più di recente, il bel Louis, Lestat e l'allegra combriccola ideati da Anne Rice. Raccontare la storia di Lord Byron in chiave vampirica, nonostante topoi strautilizzati e trovate-soluzioni narrative che ricordano la freschezza polverosa di una cripta, esercita comunque un certo fascino, considerati anche scorci e ambientazioni molto azzeccati, lugubremente accattivanti (la misteriosa Giannina, Missolungi, scenari sinistri lungo il fiume Acheronte, sperduti luoghi di una Grecia cupa e inaccessibile, e poi pure Venezia in perenne decadenza, Milano, Ravenna, e nobiltà varia e avariata, senza dimenticare pascià e sultani - tanto per non farci mancare nulla). In più: i fatti raccontati da Holland si intersecano con le vite di personaggi realmente frequentati dal poeta inglese (Percy Bysshe Shelley, Mary e la sorellastra Claire, il medico John Polidori) ed eventi memorabili, come la famosa notte di Villa Diodati. Tanta carne al fuoco, dunque, carne al sangue ça va sans dire: ma io, francamente, la preferisco ben cotta. -
Том Холанд създава забележителен роман за лорд Байрон. В него е намерен балансът между готика, хорър и историзъм с вплетени биографични елементи, а този похват на писане едновременно пренася читателя в епохата на Романтизма и го кара да я анализира в съвременността. Историята на скандалния поет е разказвана в съвремието от самия него (превърнал се във вампир) пред младата Ребека, която влиза в дома му, търсейки истината за изчезването на майка си.
Байрон говори за младостта си и съпътстващите я разочарования, за търсенето на удовлетворение от живота и невъзможността да го постигне, за дружбата си с Хобхаус, за странстванията им, за приятелството си с Шели и отношенията си с д-р Полидори, чиито роман „Вампирът“ е свързан с настоящата творба в много отношения. Паралелно с историческия наратив върви и готическият, т.е. хорър елементите не са за пренебрегване – има ги подземията, чудовищата, кръвопийците, убийствата и дебненето в нощта. Не са спестени и откровено погнусяващи сцени на разлагаща се плът и кръвосмешения.
Всяка една от тринадесетте глави започва с епиграф – стихове на Байрон, извадки от писма, цитати от „Дневници“ на описващия пътуванията им Хобхаус, биографията на поета от Томас Мур, уводът към „Франкенщайн“ на Мери Шели, както и извадки от „Вампирът“ на Полидори. Те допринасят за автентичното звучене на този вариант на Байроновата история. Фолклорът също присъства осезаемо при пътуването из земята на гърците, които панически се страхуват от чудовище, които пие кръв. Любовта на Байрон към Гърция е персонифицирана в образа на прекрасната Хаиде.
Джордж Байрон не може да бъде представян другояче, освен като противоречива и скандална персона, а Том Холанд се справя с тази задача доста успешно. Ако творбата бъде четена само като вампирски роман обаче, читателят едва ли ще намери нещо оригинално, което вече да не е описвано в съответния жанр. -
This book is campy, hilariously bad. It has the worst sexy/conflicted vampire elements of Rice, but with enough nods to Byron's life to keep me going till the end (it is blessedly short as edited for audio) The reading is dramatically ridiculous.
Here is a bafflingly stupid line, to give you some flavor:
(a slave girl to an ancient vampire is tearfully offering her virginity to Byron if he will help her escape)
"I was already rakish enough to know that a woman cries in order to lubricate herself" 🙄
Plenty of similar side-eye to laugh out loud moments.
If you are looking for a quick, silly shot of vampire porn, this is the ticket. -
Had this book on my shelf for quite some time and wanted to read with the hope that I was in store for a gothic masterpiece. For the most part, the author, Tom Holland (no, not the web-slinger) had produced a narrative full of the bleak, eerie and macabre atmosphere that any true lover of the genre could appreciate. The downside comes with the cheesy action sequences between Lord Byron and his enemies matched only by his corny one-liners which instead impressing, only made me laugh.
I should also mention, in spite of being a brilliant and charismatic individual, I found Lord Byron to be a pompous prick and at times contemptible with how he treats others. My favourite characters by far were the Shelleys, who were softer and more subdued in comparison. I thought the temperament for both Percy and Mary was captured well and reflected how I would presume the real-life counterparts to be. Rebecca who serves as the witness for the plot and the gateway for which the reader is able to explore Byron’s story was brave although I also found her to be very naïve.
There is one thing I would like to ask Mr Holland if I could and that would be why he felt it was necessary to include erotic content at every conceivable chance. I can appreciate that this comes with the territory given that vampires are involved but I can’t help but feel that this should be done sparingly and with a hint of subtlety as opposed to being crowbarred in at every given opportunity.
Overall, a fairly decent read with a balanced blend of gothic and gory elements. The overarching theme of the book revolves around the question of immortality and the moral conflict man has to undergo in order to obtain it... should he desire to. -
Just finished it.It is compared to Interview with a vampire but i have to say that i feel meaningful difference from this book and Interview with vampire.When i read Interview with vampire i had to skip few pages in this case i read every letter and when i had to drop book i was sorry for it. His highest vampire,Velekh Pasha is scarier to me then any other. He walks in daylight and Bayron's first meeting with him is done inn late noon or so. Something is scary in it. He even smiled at him.I can not get bihind that moment. And how lucky was Byron's friend without knowing it that he managed to control him self and never actually attack him and feed on him though he was with him often.There are some mildly erotic moments but they are you know..."panties tingling". Haha. However ,there is bit Bram Stocker Dracula in it and bit of Interview with vampire but i enjoyed this one more.Incomparably more ,then other two.Ending is so scary that i don't like to remember it.Description of crypt is also scary in it's own way. As characters are descending in dark passages you feel as you go9 there with them. Surprising book from man who made that religious documentary that made so much noise recently.Historian writing good book about vampires .He connected history and fiction.I guess two things he likes.
-
The figure of the brooding, Byronic hero and that of the vampire found their places in English literature at around the same time, both as part of the Romantic movement of the late 18th-early 19th centuries. One of the first vampire stories written in English was in fact composed by Dr. Polidori, the physician of Lord Byron himself.
In this novel, the two figures are blended, as Lord Byron, poet, lover, scandal-driven exile and freedom fighter is further cursed with an immortality, stained with vampiric thirst.
The novel is suffused with the dark, rich elements of the gothic literature of the period - brooding castles, tormented, driven hero, exotic travel,tragic heroines, twisted lusts and, of course, lots of gore.
A particularly piquant cruelty is leant to Byron's situation in that he is not only the sensitive, anguished type of vampire of more recent decades, there is also that in his nature harking back to the more brutish, deadly revenant of folklore.
An entertaining, intelligent take on both the vampire and the Byron mythos. -
Was für ein tolles Buch. Endlich mal wieder ein Vampir-Buch der alten Sorte, und nicht dieser Teenager-Kram, der mich ehrlich gesagt auch immer wieder gut unterhält, haha. Es geht um Lord Byron, eine Person, die wirklich gelebt hat. Es werden Zitate von Personen um Byron herum benutzt, außerdem waren Teile der Geschichte sicher historisch richtig belegt. Byron´s Andersartigkeit wird hier erklärt, auf fantastische Art und Weise. Er ist ein Vampir. Der größte Teil des Buches ist also seine Lebensgeschichte, welche er Jahre später erzählt. Manches war für mich ein wenig zu viel. Ich will keine Spoiler nennen, ich meine das dunkle Geheimnis, welches mir doch zu absurd erschien. Ansonsten jedoch ein tolles Buch, voller Leben, Liebe, Sex, aber auch Grauen, Horror, Tod.
-
It's a vampire book, but it was nice reading a vampire novel with the classical gothic vampire that is evil, sucks blood, kills humans and LIKES it. None of that urban fantasy crap where vampires are plain sexual beings that put a little adventure into having sex. No this is the classical gothic vampire story and I love this book. It starts off kind of slow and for a while there one thinks it will keep going the same road as Dracula, but it takes a turn - for the better - and turns the main character into a vampire.
-
Текстът се лее, преводът е чудесен! Самата история, обаче, не е по моя вкус.
Началото ме заинтригува, започва мистично, много добре е пресъздадена готическата атмосфера. По сюжет е фикция и хорър, нямаше нищо цветно в книгата, всичко е в черни, бели и червени оттенъци. Авторът използва животът на лорд Байрон, върху чиято основа построява една фантастична история тип "Интервю с вампир" и "Дракула". Използвани са образите на Пърси Шели, Мери Шели, Полидори, Хобхаус и пътуванията на Байрон в Албания, Гърция, Османската империя, Италия, така както е в биографията на поета. От всичко това е написана история за това как Байрон се превръща във вампир и животът му като такъв. Похот, кървави сцени, убийства, кръв - всичко това четох с лека погнуса.
На тези, които обичат готиката и класическите истории за вампири, книгата може да допадне. Някои от сцените ми приличаха на "Интервю с вампир", понеже и тук Байрон разказва историята на превръщането си в кръвопиец. -
Meh. Definitely a fever dream, but also definitely not mesmerizing. A mildly interesting take on Lord Byron's life/unlife. Favorite part is that section involving the Shelleys (Percy and Mary), and I truly enjoyed the chapter opening real quotes from Byron and company. Our main character? Irresolute, inconstant, insufficient. Sets up for a sequel, but damned if I'll read it.
-
Hmm, somewhat mixed feelings about this one. It started great; the opening scene is spooky, mysterious, creepy, frightening. Most of the book, however, is written in a form I generally dislike. Around page 30, Lord Byron starts to tell his story, in dialogue, to another character. This comprises most of the book. Who sits and talks like that? And, who sits and listens to it? Every now and then, there's a short (maybe a paragraph) break to describe Byron and his listener, but mostly it's page after page of Byron telling the story. If you want to use Byron as your narrator, why not simply write the book in first person? It would be easier (I lost track of the number of times, the quotation marks were misused) and read better. Other than that, Byron takes a long time getting to the point of telling his listener (and us, the readers) how he became a vampire. After he's turned, the book also takes a turn for the better. It's gruesome, graphic, and far more interesting than it had been up to that point. A nice twist on the vampire mythos is the specific way that a vampire becomes ageless. I won't spoil it here, but it's morbid and morally challenging. Cool. So I liked the book, but didn't love it. And...can something be done about the blurbs on the backs of books? This one promised me that "the ending is nail-bitingly terrifying" so I was looking forward to that from the beginning. I didn't find the ending particularly terrifying, and due to that blurb, it was a bit disappointing. Maybe I should just quit reading those blurbs. But nah, that's not gonna happen.
-
Rarely, if ever, have I given up on a book with fewer than 100 pages to go. I did that with this novel.
Yeah, it's yet another Interview with a Vampire knockoff, with a tormented vampire telling his tale to a willing audience. That's okay, because the vampire is Lord Byron so it's just different enough.
I even liked the first part, in which he becomes a vampire. I was engaged. It was interesting. I was digging the book.
Then he becomes a vampire and it falls apart, for 2 reasons.
1. Stupid vampire powers. It's never fully explained, but he somehow can teleport out of his body and travel somewhere else, yet still be in a solid form to drain victims. Didn't like it. He can also change his gender. Really didn't like that.
2. Sex with his sister. Sorry, I can't get into incest, and it's never clear why a vampire would want to have sex with his sister. And even more, why she's want to have sex with him. Stupid.
I actually kinda liked the twist on vampire immortality (they'll age until they drain a relative, with a child having the most allure and potency), but a vampire is a dead corpse, right? So his little sperms should also be dead, right? Which should make it hard (haha) for a dead sperm to fertlize an egg. Right?
After that, I couldn't take it anymore. -
(4.5)
Tom Holland's well-researched novel on the possibilities of a Byron vampire intrigued my interest from the start. I'm a huge fan of both Byron and vampires, so--well, what could go wrong? Two of my favorite things in one novel...hahahaha....I wasn't at all nervous.
Well, I am sincerely glad I picked up this book. It's the perfect combination of fact and utter fiction to divine such a story that is both captivating and enlightening. It's not perfect, but it never stumbles, never flinches, perhaps only avoids certain aspects which the author may not have wanted to write?
The characterization of Byron in the novel surely is a familiar and interesting one, and I must say as a huge Shelley (Mary and Percy alike) fan, I thoroughly enjoyed the latter's part in the novel, it was easily my favorite part.
The book contains definite similarities both in nature and in style to that of The Vampire Chronicles, but I would definitely say that this is a wholeheartedly positive thing--it stands on its own. -
A minor disappointment. I’d liked the author’s non-fiction Rubicon, and a Byron biography by another writer I read some years ago. Seemed like adding vampires might be interesting, but it really wasn’t. As all of the blurbs on the jacket mention, it owes a lot to Ann Rice. Adds very little to vampire lore. Still, some decent scares, and enough history sprinkled in with the fiction to make it passable.
-
Now this is how Vampire stories should be told!! Dark & gothic!! Truly one of my all time favorite vampire novels now! I really hope there are more books by this author because be is a master at horror writing! WOW!
-
The thing is, this novel is ridiculous. It is a more concisely-written Interview With The Vampire with Lord Byron as the main character and the plot a strangely-paced version of Byron's life. The framing device is basically pointless and the long section in which the protagonist-that-we-all-know-becomes-a-vampire finds out about vampires and is trapped by one is as predictable as in any generic vampire story. It makes some frankly strange choices (giving a notably large amount of narrative justification for Byron's probable affair with his half-sister Augusta, for example) and somehow does a disservice to most of the historical figures it fictionalises (with the exception maybe of Percy Shelley, who is only a slight caricature of himself really).
However, I'm glad it exists. It's only natural that it does, given Byron's connection with the popular image of the vampire (and The Vampyre, the story written by Polidori and given a new meaning in this novel). Also, if it didn't, there wouldn't be a moment in fiction in which Byron tries to convince Shelley to become a vampire too by using the argument 'think of all the liberty we could fight for', presumably the main way to convince Percy Shelley anything is a good idea. -
I give this audiobook two stars.
The text itself is dull and lifeless, just like this portrayal of Lord Byron. It's an interesting concept with poor execution.
But! Richard E. Grant's performance is outstanding. Listen to this quick read, if only for that. -
Pros: Very imaginative, this is great for hard-core fans of the Gothic genre. It's also fantastic if you haven't already read Anne Rice and love vampires enough to forgive the cons.
Cons: Oh, my God. I cannot express how boringly written this book was. Did not have any of the details or apologetics of the Victorian era (1837-1901), which would have made the novel fantastic for its imagination. It was so hard to get through the book for that reason alone. I found the setup of back story annoying just to reach a conclusion like that.
Onto something that is not review-related but still needs commenting on.
-NOT BOOK RELATED, SKIP INFORMATION IF UNINTERESTED-
Okay. The book jacket reviews and come-ons being as misleading as they were, its purpose is clearly to sell this bad novel. But, when I get Good Reads reviews that describe Holland's Lord of the Dead as a "blood-filled bonbon", I know I'm being lied to. This is a peer-to-peer book sharing site, which makes me feel like whoever wrote that review was reading a completely different novel-or more likely, didn't read my book at all.
What I can conclude, though I can basically do nothing about it, is that thousands of people must be paid on this site to give any book-not just this one-four to five undeserved stars and a glowing undeserved review. That's not fair. Good Reads is starting to remind me of restaurant reviewing sites who do the exact same thing. It's deceitful. Sorry to rant but I had to get this off my chest. -
Всъщност, като за готически роман, книгата не е съвсем лоша. Усеща се влиянието на Брам Стокър, Мери Шели и Ан Райс. Умението да се вплете истина и измислица, може според някои и да показва майсторство, но мен лично ме дразни, напомня ми на жълт вестник. Тенденцията да се използват известни имена, за да се привлече публика - също, въпреки, че точно името на Байрон ме привлече към романа. Оценявам, обаче, иронията: Джордж Байрон често е бил наистина демоничен в отношението си към околните, а към жените в живота си - истински вампир, макар и в преносен смисъл. Както и да е - беше достатъчно увлекателен за да го прочета докрай, въпреки, че това не е моят жанр и на места ми беше малко прекалено театрален, като филм за чудовища от началото на 20-ти век. Не е достатъчно добър, обаче, за да го препоръчам.
-
Ein Vampirroman, der mich begeistert hat. Auch weil er den Vampirismus auf einen indische Mythen und Kulte zurückführt und mit historischen Ereignissen verknüpft. Holland verknüpft in seinem Roman viele bekannte Personen, und da auch Bram Stoker in der Handlung eine Rolle spielt, wird „Das Erbe des Vampirs“ die Inspirationsquelle für „Dracula“. Zu sagen gilt noch, dass der Roman wie eine Sherlock Holmes Roman aufgebaut ist, da der Erzähler die deduktive Methode um Machenschaften in London des Jahres 1888 aufzuklären. Das wird im Roman damit erklärt, dass der Arzt und der Schöpfer von Sherlock Holmes während ihres Studiums denselben Dozenten gehabt hatten, der als Initiator dieser Methode gilt. Man sieht, Holland hat sehr genau recherchiert und weiß dies geschickt in seinen Roman einzubauen.
-
Отдавна бях хвърлила око на тази книга, даже няколко пъти се каня да я включа в селекцията на "Сладкарничка за книги", обаче все нещо ме спираше. Не й е било дошло времето.
На пролетния панаир я съзрях на щанда на "Еднорог" и си я купих (на третия заход около щанда...). Аз ли съм имала вид на зъл четящ не знам, Hammerfall ли уплашиха госпожата зад щанда, но получих предпазлив съвет, че може и да не ми хареса.
Всъщност се оказа очарователна книга. От онзи тип очарование, който те сграбчва с дълги нокти, разпаря ти гърлото и ти дава да оближеш кръвчицата от пръстите му.
Пък и обичам Байрон.
Благодаря за удоволствието на "Еднорог", ще се радвам да видя и други неща в този дух на щанда ви! -
I read this book because it came with Danyell's highest recommendations (though now, as she re-reads it, she finds it doesn't please her as much now as it did so many years ago). I was also curious because it is fiction by a nonfiction author I greatly admire, Tom Holland (author of the excellent Rubicon and the rather good Persian Fire). The story is the secret existence of George Gordon (Lord Byron) as a vampire. Kind of a cool premise, and well-told,perhaps surprisingly so for a vampire story. Anyway, it's worth reading if you're into that sort of thing.
-
This was a fun read. As a fan of Byron, gothic novels, historical fiction and vampires, this book was right in my wheelhouse. I like the way the author interwove history and the supernatural to create this entertaining tale. Those familiar with the life and work of Lord Byron will probably enjoy this flight of fancy, especially if they also enjoyed "Interview with the Vampire." The book is a bit gory, but it is a vampire book of the non-sparkly type of undead, so be warned. If you're into historical fiction, Byron and vampires, I definitely recommend this one. Enjoy!
-
This was not an easy book to get into. Wordy and very long winded for my liking. I felt the storyline got lost in the telling of the book and it was hard to know what the story was working to unfold.
I read the first 100-150 pages, skipped to around 200-210 started reading and didn't miss ANYTHING that was happening, then skipped to near the ending and same thing.
I am glad others liked it, just way too uninteresting for me. Seemed like just a vampire that liked to talk about himself.
