The Atheists Way: Living Well Without Gods by Eric Maisel

The Atheists Way: Living Well Without Gods Reviews

• 
  Lilla

  Unlike other atheist books, The Atheist’s Way, explains to both new atheists, those on the cusp of atheism and non-atheists what exactly it is that atheists believe in. Most people equate atheists with negative cynics and stoics, but the reality is that atheism can mean an extremely positive and beautiful existence; “…the atheist's way is a rich way, as rich as life itself” (page 2).
  
  This books shows everyone just how meaningful, fulfilled and ethical an atheist’s life is. I’ve seen so many questions on sites like Yahoo Answers where people will ask ethical questions of atheists expecting that question to make them doubt their path in life, but many don’t realize that religion and ethics are not hand-in-hand. You don’t need one to have the other.
  
  Dr. Maisel uses anecdotes from fellow atheists to weave a picture of their lives and their tribulations. Yes, that’s right, you think problems end with the removal of religion from life? No, far from it. He does a brilliant job of explaining how an atheist would deal with crisis and the “blues“. He shows that atheism is not just a lack of belief in deity but a “complete worldview“.
  
  For the most part, this book was courageously bracing, well-written and thoroughly refreshing. Highly recommended to those seeking an atheist path or spiritually minded persons who would like to understand the atheist’s way. However, I don’t believe long-time atheist’s will find anything new here.
  
  Rating
  I’m giving this book a 4.5 out of 5 only because in a few places I felt Dr. Maisel was being condescending to folks, like me, who are drawn to a spiritual way of life.
• 
  Steve

  Wow, this is some crap. I'm really disappointed in Dale McGowan, Dan Barker, and Hemant Mehta for their enthusiastic blurbs for this on Amazon.
  
  Maisel appears to think if he repeats the word "meaning" a whole lot, his hot air becomes meaningful. Nope. The question of purpose and satisfaction in a godless life is a valuable one, but Maisel doesn't investigate it with any concreteness or specificity. He instead just tells his readers that meaning means whatever you want it to mean and exhorts us repeatedly to make meaning however we decide to, to invest meaning, to maintain meaning, and to have meaning events, meaning efforts, meaning crises, and meaning adventures. Meaning, meaning, meaning! Inevitably meaningful, right? No. Wrong.
  
  Such a waste of money.
• 
  Lynne Favreau

  It’s not always easy to explain what being an atheist means, other than not believing in God or religion. Maisel not only explains what it means to be an atheist, free from religious dogma, but how to make meaning and become the hero in one’s own life. How we live, what we decided to invest meaning in, what our values and morals are, he asserts are the true paths to happiness, fulfillment and peace. We do not seek meaning, we make it. We create purpose and passion by deciding to. He affirms that life is a beautiful, amazing and wondrous journey and one does not need gods to explain natural phenomena. Another book that helped me understand human motives and helped inform and reaffirm my own belief system.
• 
  Steve Mount

  This is a good practical guide to finding meaning without resorting to things that other such books might suggest: praying for guidance, getting spiritual guidance from a guru or tarot cards or scripture. It is all about finding within yourself what it is that means something to you, finding a way to become your own hero rather than allowing or forcing someone else to choose for you. It is a self-help book for atheists, and a good one for those in need of the assistance. I was not searching for meaning, particularly, but it did force me to take a step back and look at myself closely. Any book that can do that is worth a read.
• 
  Rift Vegan

  
  First Read, 22 March 2009: We need more books like this!
  
  Second Read, 13 Oct 2010: It is a comfort to read this book: just knowing there are a few people out there with a similar world view. And still, "we need more books like this!" :)
  
• 
  Suzy

  This was rather "preachy" (ironically) and heavy emphasis on including "there is no god" wherever he thinks he can slip it in. That's not to say I didn't find some well thought out content within this, but the writing style was rather unpalatable.
• 
  Kevin

  A good, compact response to the oft-asked question, "If you're an atheist, how can you possible be moral/happy/etc/etc/etc."
• 
  Kirk Dawson

  Fantastic perspective on living free from religion. A total paradigm shift a must for those that have left religion.
• 
  Gerardo B. Herrera

  Maisel's book is not as good as I thought it would be. He promotes finding meaning in one's life but presents a world view that is dreary and depressing. Not to my liking.
• 
  Joelle

  2.5
  
  Maisel's arrogance comes shining through in this book, during the course of which he declares that atheism will make you smarter, totally and unerringly "rational" (a word he is a fan of but I'm not sure he understands), and, much to my horror, free of all mental ailments. Adopt [my brand of] atheism today and throw away your antidepressants tomorrow!
  
  The work includes wild speculation on the cause(s) of all of society's ills, and a lack of charity and humility with respect to anyone who disagrees with the Maisel's flavor of atheism (all other thought processes or conclusions being deemed "irrational"). While there is something to potentially be gleaned from this work (e.g. the idea that without god(s) we are forced to make our own meaning), the lack of epistemic humility and the belittling of the mentally ill make this read a poor choice-- particularly if the reader were very recent in their transition away from religion.
• 
  Paul Fidalgo

  [See my full review at my Examiner.com column:
  http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-42...]
  
  . . . Maisel's important mission is to help atheists face the truth of their circumstances, and in his book he gives some guidance as to what to do with once those circumstances are honestly understood. His message, I found, is crucial. His execution, however, is somewhat flawed, if nobly so.
  
  This book offers a vital message that I think any nonreligious person needs to hear, even if they don't realize they need to hear it: There is no inherent "meaning of life," existence really is a random, pointless phenomenon, and any meaning for which we may pine must be created by ourselves. Maisel levels with the reader, and insists that we establish our own parameters and values based on our consciences and intelligence, and encourages us to live these to our best ability. . . .
  
  More here:
  http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-42...
• 
  Nicole Cushing

  Reads a little like a self-help book penned by Jean-Paul Sartre. Maisel's main theme is that we must all make our own meaning. In some ways, this is refreshing, simply because much of the "new atheism" pays little attention to building a constructive sense of what atheism might be FOR (focusing exclusively on what atheists are AGAINST). It was also refreshing to see a complex treatment of how some atheists construct ethics (I haven't read enough about that).
  
  I'd be interested in seeing what a skeptic like Michael Shermer would say about this book. There are some passages of this book ("You get to make existential magic...") that border on the sort of "woo-woo" that Shermer and other non-believers react so strongly against.
  
  References to "existential magic" notwithstanding, Maisel definitely knows how to turn a phrase. I find optimism in his statement that "each individual's life can have meaning, even if the universe has none."
  
• 
  Ray

  Not a book that bashes god or religion, instead offers tips on how to live life without these beliefs. This is especially handy for someone who used to believe.
  
  Throughout the author quotes the experiences of others from a wide array of abandoned beliefs - no matter what flavor of atheist you are, there's probably at least one person in this book with a former belief similar to your old one. These are especially useful.
  
  The author challenges us to create our own meaning, which is a great idea. Unfortunately a few chapters got mired in this and it became somewhat repetitive, but that's the only real complaint.
  
  The author takes great pains to stress that this book outlines his way of living life as an atheist - he is not saying that his is the only correct way.
• 
  Carlos

  This book was clearly intended for those who have recently left their religion and might find themselves at odds with their newly discovered free time. Although Maisel does a good job in detailing all the ways in which one can live a meaningful life without having to go to church, the most important take-away message that I got was that it is perfectly ok for you to decide what meaning you want to give to your own life. I recommend this book to those who left religion after having it be such a large part of their lives.
• 
  Todd

  So - you don't believe in God or you're thinking about not believing in God...now what? This book creates a great discussion on creating and maintaining meaning in our lives in the absence of "supernatural enthusiasms." Its thoughtful and accessible. Unlike many atheist writers who go on angry tirades against God and religion, Maisel gently demonstrates how one might make meaning and ethics in a godless universe. I love this book.
• 
  Mike

  I largely agree with Maisel's philosophy: that we should live according to our own values, and make our own choices rather than defaulting without question to the received wisdom provided by religious and societial institutions. However, he insists that depression and mental illness is caused by people not living according to the principles laid out in his books. That just makes him look like a dick.
• 
  Steve Goldberg

  Although Im not ready to define myself as an athiest, this book certainly makes me consider it. It's provocative, compelling, well-argued and gives a strong case for making meaning in one's life. I see the damage that religion has done on many people close to me and I can only hope this book enters their lives.
• 
  O

  This book has a useful premise, but even at only 175 pages, it wasn't substantive enough -- too cutesy, anecdotal, and repetitive. It could have been condensed into a pamphlet. You've got the gist 30 pages in.
• 
  Denise

  Meh, maybe I expected too much after reading the covers. The book can be read in an afternoon. The audience that might most appreciate this book is one that is struggling with meaning and needs a quick push in the right direction.
• 
  Josh Young

  Basically it's existentialism for beginners. The existentialism is pretty much used as a self help tool. He argues that in the face of the fact that there is no God and no meaning in the universe we have to create our own meaning. Not that bad really and easily readable in a day or two.
• 
  Jerry Petersen

  Given a lack of a god to give meaning to your life, you create your own meaning in the things you do. I've just described in one sentence what it takes this book 175 pages to explain. Anyone who's already an atheist already knows this, and anyone not an atheist isn't going to read this book.
• 
  Thomas Fortenberry

  Interesting read. Seek and ye shall find many answers in this text.
• 
  Peggy Downing

  Ok, book, but the writing was a little dry and boring.
• 
  Bex

  this was OK. looking forward to exploring this path more via more readings.
• 
  Rachel Bayles

  As good a treatise as I've read on how to live a good life.
• 
  Diane

  I liked the discussion of choosing meaning and how everyone has a different way of creating that for themselves. I was put off by the negativity he had towards anyone who wasn't atheist, as though it were impossible for someone to be intelligent, conscious of choosing their meaning, and unable to choose to be anything other than atheist. He made classist comments several times that demonstrated a prejudice towards others, and he resorted to logical fallacies in several instances (slippery slope, unaccepted enthymemes, circular reasoning, straw men, etc.). I'd recommend the book with caution due to those factors. It is really a great book to read if you're struggling with how to create meaning in your life as long as you also understand that he doesn't really want you to have the freedom to fully choose what you want to believe or create meaning around unless it agrees with his premise of no gods, no spirituality, etc. His approach to atheism reminds me of religion in fact. :P