Title | : | Exemplum: The Rhetoric of Example in Early Modern France and Italy (Princeton Legacy Library, 1056) |
Author | : | |
Rating | : | |
ISBN | : | 0691067821 |
ISBN-10 | : | 9780691067827 |
Language | : | English |
Format Type | : | Hardcover |
Number of Pages | : | 334 |
Publication | : | First published December 1, 1989 |
Originally published in 1990.
The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
Exemplum: The Rhetoric of Example in Early Modern France and Italy (Princeton Legacy Library, 1056) Reviews
-
Here you find a thoughtful approach to the reading of late Renaissance texts. What happens to many readers who apply their efforts find that current understandings of examples within the scope of 'pragmatics' is far too narrow for grasping the art of example developed historically. Let me present the findings:
Semantic iterativity: In this case, the example doesn't stand along but suggests an entire network of such instances. The issue here is whether an example, dating as it does from Aristotle's analysis of the Great King of Persia, Darius or Xerxes, crossed into Europe, works as repetition or iteration.
Multiplicity: In these cases, we find examples as redundant rather than systematic.
Examples as exteriority: The discourse moves outside itself to a referential world held in common with the audience in this usage.
Rarity: In cases where conduct is explained or praised, the subject of the discourse will be either above the common man or below him. So, saints are rare, but so are depraved criminals.
Artificiality: This concerns the quality of the semiotic act itself.
Undecidability: Examples that appear open-ended, without clear boundaries.
Excess: There are always things that go beyond the example as presented.