The Engagements (Vintage Contemporaries) by J. Courtney Sullivan


The Engagements (Vintage Contemporaries)
Title : The Engagements (Vintage Contemporaries)
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 0307949222
ISBN-10 : 9780307949226
Language : English
Format Type : Paperback
Number of Pages : 516
Publication : First published June 11, 2013

A People Magazine Top 10 Best Book of the Year

The bestselling author of Maine returns with an exhilarating novel about Frances Gerety, the real pioneering ad woman who coined the famous slogan “A Diamond is Forever,” and four unique marriages that will test how true—or not—those words might be.
 
Evelyn has been married to her husband for forty years, but their son’s messy divorce has put them at rare odds; James, a beleaguered paramedic, has spent most of his marriage haunted by his wife’s family’s expectations; Delphine has thrown caution to the wind and left a peaceful French life for an exciting but rocky romance in America; and Kate, partnered with Dan for a decade, has seen every kind of wedding and has vowed never, ever, to have one of her own. As the stories connect to each other and to Frances’s legacy in surprising ways, The Engagements explores the complicated ins and outs of relationships, then, now, and forever. 


The Engagements (Vintage Contemporaries) Reviews


  • Jess

    I had mixed feelings about this one. It was quite engaging at times, but two of the main characters - Kate, especially, and Delphine - really got on my nerves.

    Kate was so unbelievably smug and self-satisfied. I found her insufferable. One chapter in to her story, and I wanted to scream, "You don't want to get married? Don't get married. Nobody cares." It went on and on with how wonderfully she was raising her daughter, birthed at home by doula, natch. She raises her angel with organic foods and gender-neutral toys, and her sister is supposed to be awful in contrast (really her sister seemed like just a fairly normal parent). Go ahead and do these things. Organic foods are great. Just please don't pontificate about the righteousness of your choices.

    As the mom of only boys, this line from Kate in reference to her nephews particularly irked me: "Boys were trouble. She'd been lucky with what she got." So much for being an enlightened person. Another character ends ups with a baby girl, just what her husband had always wanted, while another couple has five boys, just trying for that elusive girl. Evidently female progeny are far more desirable and worthy creatures.

    Similarly, I got tired of Delphine's unending comparisons of Parisian women and American women, French women and society superior in every way.

    Irritations aside, I thought the plot was clever, and Sullivan undeniably is a very good writer. I thought "Maine" was better, but no doubt many will enjoy this.

  • Vivian

    I have to say I'm surprised at all the high ratings for this novel. While the premise was interesting - following the career, at intervals, of the woman who wrote the famous DeBeers slogan, "A Diamond is Forever," as well as the relationships of fictional couples who did, or didn't, choose to marry - I found the execution heavy-handed and much too verbose. I don't need EVERY SINGLE thought a character is having at the moment to be spelled out, and I also don't need the history and reasons behind every choice a character makes. For example: a former schoolteacher mentioning to an ex-colleague that teenagers today (early 1970s) seem to have a harder time than teenagers in the past does NOT require the author to describe the complete detailed list of "ways to tell if your child is becoming a hippie," as given to parents of that time. A small anecdote would do. Or another character explaining (or complaining) of all (and I do mean ALL) the ways New York can't possibly measure up to Paris, at least to a Parisian. One or two choice culture-shocks would have told the reader more than 10 pages of rants by the character, which do not in any way advance the story. The facts may be accurate, but that doesn't mean they add anything to the narrative.

    I don't mind historical facts in a novel; I think, done well, they can add greatly to the ambiance of the story. But the facts have to pertain to the story in some way, not just serve as filler, which seems to be the case here. A good editor could have gotten this novel down to half of its 400 pages, and I think I would have enjoyed it so much more. As it is, I had to plow through the author's fact-dumping to get to the actual stories, which I did enjoy when I could find them.

  • switterbug (Betsey)

    Despite the whimsical cover, THE ENGAGEMENTS is not a lighthearted (or light-headed!) novel. Now that I've read it, I see the irony in the cover art. Moreover, the novel contains a substantial chunk of dark moments and cultivated topics. It is an ensemble piece of five separate stories (four of them about marriage), with a trajectory of over 60 years, that connect by the subject of diamonds in general and one in particular. Eventually, four of the stories are wedded together. One of them, the story of true life Frances Gerety, is the historical thread that illuminates the height of advertising--creating a market for diamond engagement rings out of thin air. Eventually, diamonds become a symbol of wedded bliss, thanks to the psychology of N.W. Ayer and Son, the advertising giants of the 20th century.

    Each story has its own year (1947, 1972, 1987, 2003, and 2011). However, the 1947 story, which belongs to Frances Gerety, jumps forward in time as she gets older. Gerety is the copywriter that worked for Ayer (and handled the DeBeers account) that came up with the signature line, "Diamonds are Forever." She is an icon in advertising history, and her story as a progressive woman in the world of men is fascinating. As a female, she was subjugated to men, and was paid half as much. She was indispensable, but was treated more like a secretary than a brilliant creator. She accepted it with grace and panache, despite her secret desire to rise to the top. She never married or had children; she was married to her career.

    What you learn about the propaganda campaign of diamond hawking? Well, don't read this book if you are near to the altar. The cultural history of the engagement ring is reason enough to call the whole thing off. The 4 C's should add a 5th--cartel, for the manufactured consumerism. Perhaps a 6th--campaign, for all the work that Ayer did to engineer the mindset that the size of the diamond equaled the commitment to marriage, as well as the groom demonstrating his worth and ambition.

    The individual stories were absorbing, each a strong example of the times for which they were written, topped with a gay wedding planned by the cousin of one of the grooms, a woman emphatically against the institution of marriage. As the stories go back and forth, you will be equally touched, entertained, and immersed.

    4.5 carats, rounded up to 5.

  • Nicholas

    Having read Sullivan's previous two novels, and not being thrilled with either of them, I was slightly perplexed by my desire to buy and read this one. But then I realized that context was important: I was about to go on a transatlantic trip and I knew I would need something light and entertaining for the flights. And Sullivan really is entertaining.

    The problem, however, is that her novels just aren't that smart. I appreciated all the archival research she did here into the diamond industry (and particularly the lives of Mary Frances Gerety and Dorothy Dignam, who are both characters in this novel, but also really did work at Ayer, the DeBeers advertising agency), and I love the feminist politics of this novel. But Sullivan is none too subtle. She kind of hits you over the head with her messages and this can grate (even when I tend to agree with them: see the 2012 exhibit of Kate and May and Jeffrey and Toby). At times I think she doesn't trust her readers to figure out the message on their own so even when she foreshadows and then has an event take place, she finds it necessary to have a character reflect on its meaning, even though if the reader has paid ANY attention, s/he KNOWS that meaning as soon as the event takes place. But it's also that Sullivan just isn't that deep and there is very little ambiguity here. Add to this that while some of the writing is artful, a lot of it (particularly some dialogue) also seemed clunky and contrived to me.

    All that said, I will not be at all surprised when I buy her next one, especially if I have to be on a plane for ten hours.

  • Lisa

    This is the type of novel that winds up getting unfairly characterized or dismissed as "women's fiction" or a "literary beach read."

    Five characters, separated in time, and apparently without connection (they have one, and you should be able to guess it) narrate this novel. In 1972, Evelyn is a well-to-do grandmother, still in love with her husband, but devastated by her adult son's recent abandonment of his own wife and children. In 1987, James is a down-on-his-luck ambulance driver, working the night shift on Christmas Eve in hopes of shoveling his family out of their mounting debt. In 2003, Delphine is a Parisian who married for dull stability and has recently left her husband to take up with a young, wild violin virtuoso in New York City - only to find that he has cheated on her. In 2012, Kate is a liberal activist who doesn't believe in marriage, rails against blood diamonds and the wedding industrial complex, and is trying to raise her daughter in an egalitarian way; today, she must set her feelings aside to celebrate the gay wedding of her beloved cousin. These characters come alive, and if the connection between them is cheesy, the characters don't suffer for it.

    But most interesting - for me, at least, was the character of Mary Frances Gerety. Unlike the other wholly fictional character, Gerety was a real person, and her sections in the book are fictionalized accounts of true events in her life. In 1947, Gerety came up with the slogan, "A Diamond Is Forever," for DeBeers, and basically invented, through advertising, the "tradition" of the diamond engagement ring. She, however, never married or had children. Gerety's chapters follow through the key events of her life, as she struggles to be a career woman in the 40s and 50s, as she eventually is marginalized as she ages, and when DeBeers honors her contributions in 1988.

    I received an advance review copy of this book through a giveaway on Goodreads.

  • Patricia Williams

    Another book that I loved. Really good, historical story about the woman who started the phrase "A Diamond is forever" for DeBeers back in the 1940's and also a story about one special engagement ring that went through 4 generations and the people that owned it. Would definitely recommend this. I love historical fiction and also a good drama!

  • Leanne

    Backstory! Backstory! This is packed with backstory, and juicy, detailed storylines, and strong female characters, and bordering-on-cheesy-yet-still-surprising links.

    We have 5 different plotlines: Frances, a single working girl at a large advertising firm, who is essentially engaged to her job. Her largest client is De Beers, and she is the brains behind the famous "A Diamond is Forever" slogan, which is very cleverly woven into the story. Then we have Evelyn, a very well-off retired teacher, who is the wife of Gerald and mother of Teddy - who is looking to divorce Evelyn's precious daughter-in-law. Next, James, an EMT struggling to make ends meet and provide for his high school sweetheart turned wife and two sons. Then Delphine, a sophisticated 40-something Parisian woman, who is enticed away from her safe and comfortable world by a whirlwind romance with a young American violinist. And finally, Kate - a woman who abhors marriage and anything to do with it, who is unfortunately stuck planning her cousin's very elaborate gay wedding and dealing with her much more traditional mother and sister. Essentially tying all of these stories together is a particular ring that appears first through a traditional proposal and is at some point stolen, inherited, lost, and then taken apart and put back together.

    This book is my perfect guilty pleasure. I am a romantic at heart, and I love love stories. But I hate the clumsy, overwrought way they are often written, and I tend to similarly hate the silly, fluffy, more comedic versions. On the contrary, The Engagements certainly has love, but it also has independence, emotional maturity, and it is written in a more literary, nuanced way than 95% of "chick lit" (I'm not a huge fan of this phrase, but it is what it is).

    Sentimental, far-reaching - it resonated with me for several days after (even as I was enjoying a week of sun-filled vacation), and to me that is the mark of a great book.

  • Carol

    Engagements was the perfect diversion to my usual fare of murder and mayhem. This enjoyable blend of historical fiction culled several stories told in bits and pieces over a span of one hundred years.. The Diamond (Ring) is the thing that glues all these stories together. Marriage in all its splendor, or not, is a secondary but important theme. Together, the stories revealed of these men and women living their lives, their hopes, their dreams, their triumphs and tragedies, kept me fascinated.

    The book opens in 1947 with the real life story of Mary "Frances" Gerety, an employee of N. W Ayer & Son who is primarily responsible for the De Beers Diamonds account. Frances, as she is known, is a self-proclaimed procrastinator, one who does her best work under pressure. Needing to come up with "a signature line" for the Ayer client Frances racks her brain and in a burst of inspiration coins the greatest advertising slogan of our times, "A Diamond Is Forever". Though not meant to be a history of the diamond market there's just enough here to whet your appetite about the subject. Several good books are mentioned for further study.

    Forward and back, back and forward each of these promises of love are unwound. It's hard not to tell you about all the characters I loved and cared about but that's the job of the author. Read the book. I was curious to see what fate would provide for each. The way one of the stories intertwined with another surprised and delighted me. I didn't see it coming, unusual for me.

    The acknowledgments give credit to some excellent resources that I plan to check out, including reference to an interview with Frances Gerety available at The Smithsonian, and full color copies of every De Beers ads residing there too.

    A thought provoking read, Engagements nudged me once again to examine my concept of what marriage is.

  • Nancy

    **Warning! Review contains spoilers!**
    My book club is reading this book, so even though I realized very early on that it wasn't really for me, I did finish it. I agree with many other reviewers: the writing itself was compelling and I will admit that the book is a bit of a page-turner. Although in the end, the bad far outweighed the good and I ended up NOT liking the book.

    I found many of the characters loathsome and completely detestable. Kate: did not like her AT ALL. I actually found myself siding with her sister May (you know, the one you weren't supposed to like, the married one who evidently watches FOX News). Kate was so self-righteous and smug with her political-correctness that I grew to dislike her more and more as the story progressed.

    Delphine was just as offensive, if not more so. Leaving poor Henri for that punk PJ? I was hoping Henri wouldn't take her back, but it seems he did. Boo, Henri! You deserved better--even if it meant being alone!

    Also, if I want to hear about how idiotic and mindless people like Kate and Delphine (read: J. Courtney Sullivan) think conservatives/Republicans are, I can do that elsewhere. I don't read novels for the purpose of being hit over the head with the author's political opinions. This book had tremendous potential, but IMO fell far short. So disappointing!

  • Alecia

    This was a tough one for me to rate with stars, and I would give this 3.5/5 stars. I think the parts were greater than the whole here. J. Courtney Sullivan is a very good writer, and this book is comprised of seemingly unrelated threads of stories that jump all over the timeline. The one story that ties the theme (in a way) all together is the story of Frances Gerety. She coined the phrase "A Diamond Is Forever" as a young copywriter in 1947. Her story thread follows her and her career and it appears Frances really existed and her story is based on fact. The other threads are individually very interesting, but I found the back and forth rather jarring, and it always took me a bit to reacclimate myself with the different characters each time the story shifted yet again. The thread that joins these different stories becomes apparent only at the end. I truly enjoyed each story thread, and applaud Sullivan's talent, but wished there was more cohesiveness in my reading experience of this book. The jumping around/different story threads device she used took away continuity for me.

  • Michael

    If you were curious about when and how the diamond engagement ring came into fashion, J. Courtney Sullivan's latest novel The Engagements will give you an idea. Life long bachelorette Frances Getty dreamed up the famous marketing line "Diamonds on Forever" in 1947, never knowing the impact it could and would have on romance, marriage and sales of diamonds.

    Woven into the story of Getty are five relationships and the impact that a single diamond ring can have on them. At first, the connection between these five relationships isn't clear, but Sullivan deftly weaves together her various plot threads until the final tapestry is revealed in the novel's last fifty pages.

    Each of the relationships is at a different point, with various parties having a differing view on the diamond ring and what it symbolizes. For some it represents a feeling of being trapped, for others its a potential road to freedom and for others it's something that isn't wanted or need and is viewed with a bit of contempt.

    What makes The Engagements works so well is the rich characters. There are some you will like more than others, but Sullivan gives the reader ample insight into their motivations and thoughts to help us understand where they are and their feelings on marriage. From the mother who is horrified at her son's impending divorce and its implication to the woman who sees marriage as outdated and unnecessary, much to the horror and chagrin of various family members, all of these characters feel authentic.

    The one downfall of the novel is a plot thread involving a lost wedding ring that seems to have been lifted out of a variety of sitcoms. In a novel where so much else rings true, this one doesn't work as well as it was intended.

    But it's a minor quibble in what is, otherwise, a stellar novel.

  • Angela Risner

    I have to admit that when I started this book, I was afraid I wouldn't be able to get through it. It starts off somewhat slow, but the story it weaves throughout time and characters is well worth continuing on.

    The story follows several individuals as well as couples throughout time. We begin with Mary Frances Gerety, who came up with the de Beers slogan of "A Diamond is Forever." In 1947. Yes, a woman came up with that slogan in 1947. I love that. We follow her story throughout the book as she is a pioneer of women who don't marry a man because they're already married to their jobs.

    We also meet Evelyn, who in 1972 is married to her second husband. She is troubled by their son's crumbling marriage.

    In 1987, we meet James, who is one of the first paramedics in Boston. He is trying to make ends meet for his family and it's Christmas.

    In 2003, we meet Delphine, a Frenchwoman who followed a much younger lover back to New York.

    And finally, in 2012, we meet Kate, who is perfectly happy being in a committed relationship with her man. She worries that allowing her daughter to be the flower girl in her gay cousin's wedding will give her the wrong message about the role of a woman.

    And eventually, we learn about the connections between all of them.

    What struck me the most was when I learned, at the end of the book, that Mary Frances Gerety was a real woman and she really did come up with the slogan for de Beers. The subject of advertising is examined throughout the book, which I found to be fascinating. It made me realize how much advertising really does affect us. Diamond engagement rings were not popular when Gerety coined that phrase. However, because of that advertising, people now feel as though they can't become engaged without a diamond ring.

    Well-written. Highly recommend.

  • Tina

    This is a hard one for me to rate. I didn't love the book but I liked the idea around it. At times it dragged and other times I was very engaged. It took me awhile to get into all 5 stories but when I did I was totally immersed in them. I think this will definitely make a good movie. Although, it may just be one of those minority books where the movie is better.

  • Ron Charles

    Thirty years ago, I spent all the money I had on two purchases: The first was a top-of-the-line Brother typewriter for $800. The second was an engagement ring for $425. When my future mother-in-law saw the diamond, she said, “Wait a minute, I need my glasses.” But my fiancee wasn’t troubled by the size of the stone or even by the cost of my typewriter. And in any case, she got the last laugh: My Brother is long gone; my wife is still here.

    As you probably know, “A diamond is forever.”

    What you may not know is that a young woman came up with that phrase in 1947 while working on an ad campaign for De Beers. Frances Gerety was a copywriter for N.W. Ayer & Son, the late, great Philadelphia advertising firm that taught us to “Reach out and touch someone” and “Walk a mile for a Camel.” Gerety’s diamond tag line was the firm’s masterpiece; Advertising Age crowned it the best slogan of the 20th century. (Take that, Don Draper!) Ironically, Gerety herself never married (neither did De Beers’s founder, Cecil Rhodes), but she and her ads crystallized an engagement expectation made from the hardest substance known to man: tradition.

    Gerety’s life is the historical spine that runs through several fictional stories in J. Courtney Sullivan’s third novel, “The Engagements.” This is “Mad Men” before the men moved to Madison Avenue, and Sullivan captures the postwar workplace in all its crisp formalities and crude prejudices. Frances is a rare woman in a chauvinistic industry dedicated to promoting consumer roles for breadwinner and homemaker. She leans in with everything she’s got, but the old boys still treat her like a super secretary. It’s a perceptive portrait of a talented woman too wise to grow bitter, but too smart to ignore the truth.

    While Frances hawks diamonds to a country that doesn’t yet know how much it wants them, “The Engagements” constantly shifts to other, less mercantile facets of romance. Like a wedding planner managing five demanding clients, Sullivan rotates, chapter by chapter, over 80 years of love, American style. From the 1930s to 2012, from chaperoned dances to Match.com, we see attitudes about relationships solidify, dissolve and reform. Some of these couples polish their devotion to a blinding sheen, some trample on their vows, and still others dare to construct something new from something old. But through it all rolls the ring adorned with a diamond — a cartel’s best friend. In Sullivan’s easy, unadorned style, “The Engagements” is a delightful marriage of cultural research and literary entertainment — the perfect book to ruin your wedding plans.

    It’s hard to describe “The Engagements” without making it sound like a lot of clunky exposition and domestic construction: five settings, dozens of characters, and all the attendant social and political contexts that need to be built for these separate plots. Don’t worry: Even jumping from story to story every few pages, Sullivan handles all the details elegantly, and the situations are surprisingly distinct, adorned with the unique elements of the times and even the disparate ways people spoke:

    ●A paramedic in Boston struggles to provide for his wife on Christmas.

    ●A wealthy, older woman can’t imagine why her ne’er-do-well son wants to abandon his wife.

    ●An antiques dealer from Paris destroys her cheating fiance’s apartment.

    ●A woman who disdains marriage must plan her gay cousin’s wedding.

    Each of these stories explores the way lovers express their affections — how they worship fidelity or rationalize infidelity as Time’s winged chariot hurries near. And as we follow them, the sparkle of that diamond ring keeps catching our eye until finally, subtly, all these characters are wedded together.

    Despite Sullivan’s portrayal of what motivates lovers, her stories remain, to a striking degree, as prim as a De Beers ad. In a series of otherwise psychologically astute character studies, she gives us intimacy almost completely devoid of sexual desire, fulfillment or frustration. Instead, 45 years after John Updike’s “Couples,” this new novel about coupling titillates us with just the explicit mechanics of advertising. And, I have to admit, the stories never grow flaccid. Perhaps in a market-obsessed culture, nothing is sexier than marketing. Not tonight, dear, I have a spreadsheet.

    But for a novel that presumes to examine a swath of marriage experiences in the 20th and 21st century, the curious thing is who’s not invited. In these pages, the bride must not only wear white, she must be white. Without insisting on a Benetton spectrum of diversity, it would have been nice to consider how marriage rituals, wedding expectations and corporate advertising play out among African Americans, for instance, or Hispanics — anything to add a little hue to this monochromatic survey.

    But I can feel relatives glaring at me, so let’s move on. This is a reception, after all. And Sullivan is at her best when cataloguing the obscene excesses of the modern wedding ceremony. One of her characters, Kate, a granola liberal whose self-righteousness could cut glass, fumes at the extravagance of her cousin’s nuptials. Don’t invite Kate to your bachelorette party: Amid the fittings and the tastings and other preparations, she lectures anyone who will listen about the evils of blood diamonds. She’s struggling to raise her daughter on organic yogurt and total gender equality, but that’s hard in a world where loved ones insist that the shape of your diamond “says a lot about you.”

    As these blessed and disastrous relationships play out across the decades, Sullivan returns again and again to the clever work of Frances Gerety and her campaign to make everyone believe that men have always given their fiancees diamond engagement rings. Every time incomes rise or fall, or new mines are discovered, or courtship attitudes shift, the Ayer agency adjusts its tune to keep American brides walking down the aisle with little chips of compressed carbon on their hands. Times change, but adiamondisforever.com.

    Examining these characters through Sullivan’s loupe, it’s impossible not to consider your own attitudes about engagement rituals. Gerety’s ads have infected us all with the tyrannical standard of the perfect will-you-marry-me moment. Who can resist feeling that the size of the gem reflects the depth of a man’s adoration? Subjected to the right propaganda, how quickly traditions can be manufactured and given the patina of age. But here’s a novel that could save you thousands of dollars. If you’re in the market for a ring, don’t worry about what the ads call the 4 C’s: cut, clarity, color and carat. It turns out, that’s all 1 C: crap. As Sullivan makes plain, whether or not your marriage gets off to a good start has nothing to do with your gemstone investment.

    I’m not giving anything away by revealing that “The Engagements” ends with a wedding. An engagement ring, after all, is like Chekhov’s gun: If we see it in the first act, it had better be used by the time the curtain falls. And for all her sharp wit and insight into the agony of failed relationships, Sullivan’s no cynic. The novel’s final wedding transcends the craziness and the extravagance and the bickering. Against all odds, it represents something genuinely eternal about the love between two people.

    Do I believe in that?

    I do.

  • Denise

    This novel incorporates the factual history of the engagement ring and our fascination with size, clarity and price. The Engagements has more character development than plot. Sullivan relates the stories of four different marriages and their relationships spanning thirty some years. Evelyn and Gerald, long term marriage of 40 some years was perhaps my favourite story. The other three were also different but interesting. All the stories are linked by the true story of France's Gerety, who wrote, in the 1940's the slogan of "A Diamond is Forever."
    I enjoyed Sullivan's writing but kept wondering when these individual stories would be linked. It kept me wondering until the end! 3.5 stars ( KUYH's August Who Runs the World.....Girls)

  • Elizabeth

    Some really excellent story telling happening here. The Engagements creates a fascinating intertwining of 5 different stories about marriage without being too complicated or cliché. This is not chick lit, nor is it light-hearted! One of my favourite reads of 2016!

  • Cher

    3 stars - It was good.

    This book has a unique setup: 5 different plotlines that are loosely connected, each following the diverse characters for a few decades. It was interesting to peak inside such different marriages and see how each one's relationship evolved.

    Delphine's character was the most controversial and could inspire lively discussion in a book club. Unlike most other readers, I didn't cheer her on with her revenge (and seriously, that was too far with Charlie). I'd call it a trope except you see it so often in real life, but I truly cannot fathom how anyone expects faithfulness from someone they begin a relationship with through an affair. It's naiveté meeting karma each and every time.
    -------------------------------------------
    Favorite Quote: People wanted you to validate their choices by doing the same thing they had done.

    First Sentence: And what gives diamonds their hard and remorseless beauty, really?

  • Patty

    The Engagements
    by
    J.Courtney Sullivan

    My " in a nutshell" summary...

    Sort of the history of De Beers diamonds and the way they were used in advertisements years and years ago. Add to that the stories of couples...and their diamond rings...that sums up this book!

    My thoughts after reading this book...

    This is a story that began with Frances...who was a woman working in advertising when women were only given "women" things to work on and made half the salary of men in advertising. France's came up with the slogan "a diamond is forever". This was also at a time when diamonds were not that popular and only the really wealthy had them and they usually were in the family for years and years.

    So...that's the beginning of this lovely book. The rest of the book meanders among couples that are married, about to be married, shouldn't be married and those who question marriage. The book touches different years...sort of in a back and forth manner...and quite honestly...I had no clue how anything was connected until I was almost at the end of the book. The lives of the couples in each section were interesting and varied. Some were wealthy, some not so wealthy, some were happy, some not so happy. Some sections were more interesting than others but that didn't detract from the simple loveliness of this book.

    What I loved about this book...

    I loved some couples and some years more than others. I loved Evelyn and Gerald. Old fashioned, polite, and sweet with a nasty spoiled son. I didn't love James and Sheila. I didn't love Daphne, either, but her story was engaging and fun to read. There were tons of characters within the essential stories but it was easy to keep all of the characters in order. I also loved the way the story continued to go back to Frances.

    What I did not love...

    It's essential to the book but there was a ton of sort of wordy stuff to read. Some of the events were not that interesting and seem to go on...and on...but I managed and still loved the book.

    Final thoughts...

    Readers who love a great story that begins in the forties and goes on until the present
    will delight in this book.

  • Laura Hogensen

    This novel incorporates the factual history of the engagement ring and America's fascination with it and with diamonds as a stones to be prized above all others. As Don Draper has said multiple times, what we think we want is really a creation of advertisers. The engagement ring as a symbol of love and diamonds as a symbol of status are a relatively new creation with no basis in history. Those sections of the novel were very interesting and Sullivan did a good job of incorporating fact with fiction. Her novel was less successful when it came to the characters themselves. The novel is told in alternating sections and time periods, with characters that don't know each other, but are loosely connected based on their engagement rings - or their involvement in engagement ring advertising. Whereas the characters in Maine and Commencement had emotional ties and interesting stories, these stories didn't grab me as much. I wanted to know what was going to happen, but I didn't feel as connected to each character the way I did with her other novels. It's a good read if you're already a Sullivan fan, but if this is your first foray into her work, I would recommend Maine instead.

  • Christin

    The premise of this book is totally predictable, but getting there is truly a pleasure and quite inventive. Sullivan has a smooth, readable style that I admire more and more with each successive novel. She writes tight prose and credible characters that are fun to meet, even if some may come across as slightly insufferable or preachy. I haven't read Maine yet, but I feel like as a Smithie, she feels honor-bound to have at least one token strident feminist in every novel. The fact that I just used the phrase "strident feminist" as a devout feminist makes me loathe myself a little, but critique is part of the work; I still believe such politically-conscious characters could be achieved without making them ring (pun intended) as obnoxious. I think Sullivan needs to work on that. The true center and delight of The Engagements was Sullivan's portrayal of real-life Peggy-Olsenesque diamond advertiser, Frances Geretty. She was a true maverick, and I think Sullivan's depiction offers fitting tribute.

  • Nina Draganova

    Приятно написана, без да има претенции за нещо уаоо .
    Всичко се върти около диамантите и постепенното им фаворизиране .
    И историите на няколко човека в различни години на миналия век , обединени от един пръстен.
    Харесаха ми някои гледни точки.
    На французойката Делфин за Америка и Ню Йорк.
    На Кейт за брака .

  • Gayle

    Like Maine, The Engagements has more character development than plot, which was fine with me. It contains four stories about love and marriage, spanning thirty years between 1972 and 2012. Evelyn and Gerald have been happily married for 40 years, but are now facing the demise of their son’s marriage, which brings up some tough memories about how they met. Present-day Kate and Dan don’t believe in the need for marriage to establish their commitment to each other and their young daughter. James and Sheila, struggling financially in the mid-1980s, nonetheless stay true to each other. Finally, Delphine, a French woman who left her husband in 2002 to follow a young American musician to New York, wonders if she made the right choice. The stories are all underpinned by the true story of Frances Gerety, a young copywriter who wrote the famous DeBeers’ tagline, “A Diamond is Forever” in the 1940s, thus cementing the diamond ring as the symbol of love and marriage for decades to come.

    I enjoyed The Engagements quite a bit. Each of the storylines was compelling, with twists and surprises that kept me guessing how they would play out. (The individual strands do connect, eventually, at the end of the novel.) I liked these flawed characters, with the exception of Kate, who is possibly the most self-righteous character I’ve come across in a book recent memory. She was so heavy-handed in her organic food-eating, anti-materialistic, ultra-socially conscious way that I found myself rolling my eyes at her throughout the whole book.

    I like Sullivan’s writing – detailed and rich, but also smooth and easy. This was a fun and satisfying book to read. Lots of detail, lots of historical touches thrown in. (You can tell that Sullivan does exhaustive research for her books.) Again, there are many flashbacks and not a lot of plot. But that didn’t bother me – I enjoyed getting to know these characters and their lives.

    See full review at:
    http://everydayiwritethebookblog.com/...

  • Chris

    I decided to take the month of June, a big wedding month, to read this book. And it was lovely. I've read all three of Courtney's books, and feel she really stepped it up several notches with this one. With five separate stories, which in some way we discover are connected in the end, she ably tells each one with the theme of diamonds and weddings somewhere in the mix. I know this book had mixed reviews, but I loved it and can't wait to see what she writes next.

  • Karina

    The story line never connected for me. I thought at one point it would connect to the first story but it never did in an easy way. The characters were all crappy ppl i couldn't connect with and I just never understood the plot to where it would have to do with diamonds. I usually like it when a book is told in many ppl's points of views but this one just didn't do it for me...

  • J. Parra

    In her ambitious new novel, The Engagements, J. Courtney Sullivan skillfully interweaves five separate stories united by one theme: marriage. It’s the sort of book that pleasantly reminds you how enjoyable fiction can be even as it gives you substantial points to ponder.
    The book carries the reader through four distinct years and four different lead characters: 1972 (Evelyn), 1987 (James), 2003 (Delphine), 2012 (Kate). If this sounds daunting or formulaic, it is not. Each character and each character’s relationship unfurls organically and with great attention to historical detail. Sullivan has clearly done her research, writing with authority about disparate subjects such as paramedic techniques, classical music and instruments, French culture, even the world of advertising.
    The story of Mary Frances Gerety, the woman who coined the ubiquitous “A diamond is forever” slogan provides narrative pillars for the book. Sullivan brings her to life, capturing her at various junctures in her career working on the De Beers diamond account and fostering the language that compelled so many men to purchase diamond engagement rings for their fiancées, a practice that is both relatively modern and, as we learn in the story, completely fabricated by the diamond industry. ‘They didn’t know why they wanted diamonds, but they wanted them all the same. There was no tradition, not really. But she had convinced them otherwise.”
    The modern details are the funniest as the character of Kate steadfastly refuses to buy into today’s excessive wedding rituals even as her gay cousin prepares to tie the knot. “Early on, even as far back as high school, Kate was distrustful of marriage. The popular perception was so sad and discouraging, so Everybody Loves Raymond.”
    Sometimes books that weave together various timelines and characters can feel weighed down and mechanical, but The Engagements masterfully provides compelling characters that hold the reader’s interest while exploring provocative subject matter. Franco-American politics, the origins of blood diamonds, the acceptance of gay marriage, class warfare, are all part of Sullivan’s canvas.
    Ultimately, the themes of love and marriage permeate The Engagements, as one character reflects, “No one has the right to comment on the way anyone falls in love…No one can ever know the inner parts of anyone else’s marriage. It’s strange business.”
    It’s tempting to want to reveal the various ways Sullivan’s storylines intersect but part of the joy of The Engagements is in allowing the author to capably bring everything together. It’s an accomplished, engaging (pun intended) work that will keep readers happily turning pages this summer.

  • Kelly_Hunsaker_reads ...

    3.5 stars rounded up for one character.

    Although this book is enjoyable it is also choppy and some sections are far better than others.

    The Engagements is about five characters, who live in different places and times, seemingly unconnected from one another. Each woman narrates her part of the story, and this is an aspect of the book I particularly enjoyed. I love the intimacy of storytelling that lets me get inside the thoughts and actions of an individual, and shifts in narrative allow me to know each character better.

    First, we meet Evelyn in 1972. She is a wealthy grandmother, married long-term, and the mother of an adult son. Evelyn is angry at her son who abandoned his own wife and children to be with the woman who is his mistress. Evelyn is disappointed, sad and embarrassed. Our second character is met in 1987. James. He is an ambulance driver stuck working night shift of Christmas Eve. He is struggling with massive debt and trying desperately to get out of it. Our third character is Delphine, a Parisian who is in a dull marriage with a man who doesn't love her. She falls in love with an American violinist, only to find that he is a cheater. In 2012 we meet Kate who doesn't believe in marriage. She is an activist, and is working to make people understand the evils of blood diamonds. Her story centers around the wedding of her gay cousin/friend. She must put aside her own feelings about weddings and marriage for him. All of these stories were good, but not great. I found them slightly too perfect. A little sappy and simplistic.

    But then there is the fifth character and narrative. Mary Frances Gerety. This storyline is a fictionalized account of a real person. And it was by far the most interesting portion of the book. Gerety worked in advertising in the 1940s, when women were nearly nonexistent in the industry. In 1947 her firm was working on a slogan for DeBeers, and is responsible for penning "A Diamond is Forever." She is said to be responsible for the tradition of buying a diamond ring for an engagement ring. Living in 2020, seeing that nearly every married woman wears a diamond solitaire, and hearing this slogan all the time, I was a bit starstruck by Gerety. I can only imagine how difficult it was to be a woman in that world. Gerety never married or had children. She was a career woman.

    These sections of the book - dedicated to Gerety's story - were fun to read, interesting, informative and enjoyable. I kind of fell in love with this powerhouse woman.

    The five stories do come together in the end, and we get to see how five such diverse people impact one another. It is a fun book, though I wish the other four characters were written with as much care as Gerety was.

  • Kim Hollstein

    The "F" word runs throughout this novel. Glorious, strong, liberating Feminism (gotcha!!!). It intrigues me how certain authors resonate and others leave me cold. Sullivan's narrative and a characters are riveting and honest, funny and real. Kate especially touched my heart, as I tend to passionately embrace causes as fervently..."She briefly imagined shaking the bag in front of him and saying, 'You realize these stupid things have fueled entire brutal regimes in Africa, right? They're shiny little death pellets, let's be honest". Wow...now that's my kind of woman! I know it's not popular in our blinged out culture not to be a fan of diamonds, but they have never held the same fascination for me (I had a star sapphire for my engagement ring), so I loved finding a book that centered on how advertising hoodwinked everyone to believe it takes a hunk of expensive jewelry to express our love and devotion. Throw in a subplot about a little girl's first exposure to a pink Barbie cavalcade of fluff; my very favorite topic of gay marriage rights; and the explosion of resources spent on over the top weddings...and you have here, ladies and gentlemen...one FANTASTIC book!!!

  • Lauren

    J. Courtney Sullivan can do no wrong! Each of her books stands alone, completely unique and thoroughly engrossing. I was immediately sucked into this story that spans decades and and shifts between fascinating characters. I also learned a little more about diamonds, every girl's best friend! I didn't want "The Engagements" to end and I'm sure every reader will feel the same way - a worthy read!