Title | : | Canadian Gothic: Literature, History, and the Spectre of Self-Invention |
Author | : | |
Rating | : | |
ISBN | : | 0708327001 |
ISBN-10 | : | 9780708327005 |
Format Type | : | Hardcover |
Number of Pages | : | 291 |
Publication | : | First published March 15, 2014 |
Canadian Gothic: Literature, History, and the Spectre of Self-Invention Reviews
-
Perhaps 2 out of 5 is not fair. Perhaps expecting that a tome entitled
"Canadian Gothic: Literature, History, and the Spectre of Self-Invention"
would explore a broad range of Canada's Gothic Literature. I know that it really is not possible to expect Cynthia Sugars, a Professor of English at the University of Ottawa, to eschew the detestable academic habit of altering nouns into verbs when there are perfectly good verbs available in the English language that would do the trick.
To quote from one of the blurbs on the back cover: "...'Canadian Gothic' is a groundbreaking study of the history of English-Canadian Gothic from its colonial beginnings to the present, offering a depth and breadth of analysis that is unprecedented and comprehensive in scope. - Jennifer Andrews, Professor and Chair of the Department of English, University of New Brunswick. High praise, pity it is undeserved. I cannot speak to the "unprecedented in spoke" but can speak to the "comprehensive in scope". To put it politely, it's a gross exaggeration. I'm not feeling polite, it's a base lie.
Anyone who has read Canadian literature - and especially a gothic specialist would be aware of and know intimately of all the which texts ghostly, monstrous, remote and supernatural elements. These may not form the backbone of Canadian Gothic literature but they certainly are its gristle. Reading this text one can only imagine that the uncanny exists only as a vestigial appendix in the bowels of English Canadian fictions.
Sugars seems to cherry pick texts to "prove" her thesis explained in Chapter headings such as:
Here There Be Monsters: Wilderness Gothic and Psychic PROJECTION
Haunted by a LACK of Ghosts: Gothic ABSENCE and Settler Melancholy
To be fair, my background is in the biological sciences. There, as in all sciences, one posits a theory and then looks at ALL available evidence before drawing conclusions. If ALL available evidence is not available or is too vast to handle then it is accepted practice to take SEVERAL randomized samples and test the theory against those samples. IF and WHEN results from those samples AGREE enough with each other to be STATISTICALLY significant then and ONLY then can one draw any conclusion whatever.
Sugar, and she is no exception, has put the cart before the horse. Theory first, then look texts which support the theory or can be interpreted to support the thesis which leads to the grand conclusion that you were right after all. (Much ado about nothing.)
Pity. I really was looking forward to learning something.