Title | : | Glowing Enigmas |
Author | : | |
Rating | : | |
ISBN | : | 1935635220 |
ISBN-10 | : | 9781935635222 |
Language | : | English |
Format Type | : | Paperback |
Number of Pages | : | 120 |
Publication | : | First published January 1, 1966 |
Glowing Enigmas Reviews
-
Enigma is certainly the right term for these mysterious and sometimes painful poems. But the piercing eye and mind of Nelly Sachs bring the reader along--wherever she chooses to go. This is simply amazing:
This night
I turned the corner into
a dark side street
Then my shadow
lay down in my arm
This tired piece of clothing
wanted to be carried
and the color Nothing addressed me:
You are beyond!
-
Metro altındaki kitapçının 'elden çıkartmak' için adam yayınlarını kelepir fiyata sattığı standttan aldığım kitaplardan biri. O kitaplardan bazılarını hiç sevmesem de bu gerçekten çok güzel.
Akkor Bilmeceler, neredeyse kitap uzunluğunda bir şiir aslında. Normalde 4 tane Akkor Bilmeceler var, bizim baskı I ve II'sini içeriyor (sebep? belki farklı zamanlarda basılmıştır).
Duru, dramatik, lirik bir üslubu var. Betimleme, benzetme ve imgelemler şahaneydi. Savaşın (WWII) yıkımını, acısını, trajedisini savaştan bahsetmeden, kişisel ve kitlesel şeyleri daha kapsayıcı bir dille anlatmış sanki; o yüzden içe işlemesi daha geçirgen bence.
"Kanamak bir akşam uzunluğunca
kazıp hazırlayana kadar mezarı karanlık
Tekmeler atıyor
bir düşün oğulcuğu ana rahminde
Yoktan var eden hava
usulca örtünüyor yeni doğumun derisini üzerine
Suretler yelpazesi açılınca
acı da kaybediyor kendi adını
Sürüp gidiyor dirim ve ölüm -"
Çeviriyi çok sevdim. 1985 basım olduğu için, 'çevirmenin şiiri'ne de dönüşmüş olma ihtimali vardı. Dili çok hoşuma gittiği ve bazı yerlerde acaba dedirttiği için kitabı buldum, açtım baktım. Abartmadan, süslemeden, ekleme-çıkartma yapmadan, gerektiği güzel kelime seçilerek çevrilmiş, hatta kimi yerlerde ingilizcesinden güzel çevrilmiş (geçen yine süperim)akkor mesela çok güzel bi kelime
xoxoxo
iko -
Of course, I am familiar with Sachs' famous longer poems, mediations on the Holocaust which she survived. (See: "O The Chimneys.") I had never heard of her book-length poem, glowing enigmas, before. Michael Hamburger is an estimable translator. His versions of Sachs' friend and colleague Paul Celan's poems are among my favorites. The Celan book is a dual language text and I found myself wishing this book was too. I also would have loved an introduction that places the poem and poet in context. But the book is a remarkable achievement. So many contemporary poets write in enigmatic, elliptical styles--but they are just that, styles. But the urgency of Sachs' enigmas is that plain speech and meaning were broken apart by the Nazis. These haunting, sad pieces of memory, beauty and dread don't add up. They remain enigmas. Each page is a mediation.
It is black like
chaos before the word
Leonardo looked for that black
behind black
Job was swaddled
in the life-bearing body of the stars
Someone shakes the blackness
till the apple Earth drops
ripened to the end
A sigh
is that the soul--? -
More like a 3.5 for me. Some great punches of melancholy with war survivor heaviness.
-
GLOWING ENIGMAS by female Nobel Laureate, Nelly Sachs, is just that— an enigma.
.
Sachs was either batty or brilliant and, after reading through this twice (and many passages several times), I’m choosing brilliant. Inconceivably. So much so I can’t fully grasp what I just read. Suffice it to say, I’m in awe.
.
I feel like she was one of those “beautiful mind” types. So remarkable, in fact, that I can’t seem to entirely wrap my own around what she wrote.
.
The poems had no sense of flow. Like each page was its own but they were all knit together to create a whole. There was a sense of no sense throughout. Yet THAT just made sense. Does that make sense?
.
Written in four parts, the writing is quite superb. It is lyrical and lovely. I just wish I knew what she was talking about. When I thought I got it, she did a 360 and I was left questioning what just happened. I’m confident I understood some, but I would liked to have followed it all the way through.
.
I’m not sure if I feel stupid or just stumped. I know I do feel vulnerable sharing this as I don’t know if this makes me sound uneducated. If it does, so be it. All I know is that I appreciate her work and how beautifully read it is. I just hope I’m not alone in this analysis.
.
An interesting side note is a quote from Sachs of her own work. She stated, “My metaphors are my wounds.” Indeed. GLOWING ENIGMAS is aptly titled. -
Every word of this poem is perfectly placed. Every phrase so carefully timed and arranged that I had to read most of it a couple times for maximum impact and a better form of understanding. Got turned on to this poet through a wonderful book called “Translation as Transhumance” which also gave me a greater appreciation of the work of a translator (this guy did a fantastic job).
-
Definitely enigmatic. Beautiful language but will likely take multiple readings to fully appreciate. 4th section was most accessible in my view parts remind be a little of Plath.
-
When I come to leave the room protected by illness
free to live—to die—
air with its welcoming kiss
deeply delights the twin mouth
then I shall not know
what my invisible
will do with me now— -
It is hard to write a fair review of this work. I know its something of a classic and highly praised for what it represents (a coming to terms with the evil of the Holocaust). The imagery is just beautiful, the words euphonic. But the meaning of the imagery is a riddle (true to its title) and I am not alone in that conclusion. As another reviewer put it, the pieces of the poem "don't add up", making it very frustrating to read. Even after looking up Sachs' bio and some published reviews of the poem, I am still not sure what I read, exactly. At the end of the book is a short biography of Sachs that, actually, explains a lot about the poem - hints at her mindset and suggests an explanation. She wrote it while living in Stockholm in the 1960s, in a four-square-meter apartment, by herself. (There is nothing better, or worse, than loneliness for spawning idiosyncrasies.) Sachs once said about her own work, "my metaphors are my wounds". After reading Glowing Enigmas, that statement makes a lot of sense to me. Her words 'open'. They don't suggest they'll close, and they don't - there are no denouements. The metaphors only keep opening, unreconciled, one from another, and don't explain anything: they are like a wound that can't heal. Brilliant lights that birth only darkness...
"I write you --
You have come into the world again
with the haunting strength of letters
that groped for your essence
Light shines
and your fingertips glow in the night
Constellations at the birth
of darkness like these verses --"