50 Philosophy Classics: Thinking, Being, Acting, Seeing: Profound Insights and Powerful Thinking from Fifty Key Books by Tom Butler-Bowdon

50 Philosophy Classics: Thinking, Being, Acting, Seeing: Profound Insights and Powerful Thinking from Fifty Key Books Reviews

• 
  Magdalena Golden

  Solid 5* for the content. The book is a wonderful introduction to the major philosophical works and certainly got me more interested in reading more, especially as far as modern philosophers are concerned.
  
  However, I was not convinced by the alphabetic order right from the start and only got progressively more annoyed it as I was reading. I decided to read the chapters in chronological order so first I had to come up with it (I'm attaching a list at the bottom of this review for those of you who want to do the same).
  
  That in itself was an annoying task but then having to always consult my list after every chapter and synchronising progress across my reading devices was a pain each and every time. And that jumping was made even more annoying by the fact that I found it easier to associate ideas with philosophers' names but the chapters are named after particular books which further contributed to the nuisance. It also meant I was not able to easily go back to refresh my memory which, again, was annoying because by far most of the references are chronologically anaphoric so would have made no sense to me had I decided to read the book in the order that it is presented in.
  
  In any case, here is the chronological order:
  The number in brackets refers to chapter number
  1. (21) Heraclitus - Fragments - 6th century BC (mistakenly written AD in the book)
  2. (12) Confucius - Analects - 5th century BC
  3. (38) Plato - The Republic - 4th century BC
  4. (2) Aristotle - Nicomachean Ethics - 4th century BC
  5. (15) Epicurus - Letters - 3rd century BC
  6. (11) Cicero - On Duties - 44 BC
  7. (31) Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince (1513)
  8. (34) Michel de Montaigne - Essays (1580)
  9. (13) René Descartes - Meditations on First Philosophy (1641)
  10. (37) Blaise Pascal - Pensées (1660)
  11. (47) Baruch Spinoza - Ethics (1677)
  12. (30) John Locke - Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689)
  13. (29) Gottfried Leibniz - Theodicy (1710)
  14. (22) David Hume - An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748)
  15. (41) Jean-Jacques Rousseau - The Social Contract (1762)
  16. (25) Immanuel Kant - Critique of Pure Reason (1781)
  17. (7) Jeremy Bentham - Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789)
  18. (19) G.W.F. Hegel - Phenomenology of Spirit (1807)
  19. (45) Arthur Schopenhauer - The World as Will and Representation (1818)
  20. (26) Søren Kierkegaard - Fear and Trembling (1843)
  21. (33) John Stuart Mill - On Liberty (1859)
  22. (14) Ralph Waldo Emerson - Fate (1860)
  23. (36) Friedrich Nietzche - Beyond Good and Evil (1886)
  24. (8) Henri Bergson - Creative Evolution (1907)
  25. (23) William James - Pragmatism (1907)
  26. (20) Martin Heidegger - Being and Time (1927)
  27. (42) Bertrand Russel - The Conquest of Happiness (1930)
  28. (39) Karl Popper - The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934)
  29. (3) A.J. Ayer - Language, Truth and Logic (1936)
  30. (44) Jean-Paul Sartre - Being and Nothingness (1943)
  31. (6) Simone de Beauvoir - The Second Sex (1949)
  32. (49) Ludwig Wittgenstein - Philosophical Investigations (1953)
  33. (1) Hannah Arendt - The Human Condition (1958)
  34. (28) Thomas Kuhn - The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962)
  35. (16) Michel Foucault - The Order of Things (1966)
  36. (32) Marshall McLuhan - The Medium Is the Massage (1967)
  37. (35) Iris Murdoch - The Sovereignty of Good (1970)
  38. (40) John Rawls - A Theory of Justice (1971)
  39. (27) Saul Kripke - Naming and Necessity (1972)
  40. (9) David Bohm - Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980)
  41. (5) Jean Baudrillard - Simulacra and Simulation (1981)
  42. (10) Noam Chomsky - Understanding Power (2002)
  43. (17) Henry Frankfurt - On Bullshit (2005)
  44. (48) Nassim Nicholas Taleb - The Black Swan (2007)
  45. (46) Peter Singer - The Life You Can Save (2009)
  46. (43) Michael Sandel - Justice (2009)
  47. (50) Slavoj Žižek - Living in the End Times (2010)
  48. (4) Julian Baggini - The Ego Trick (2011)
  49. (24) Daniel Kahneman - Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)
  50. (18) Sam Harris - Free Will (2012)
• 
  Tim Krete

  I throughly enjoyed this book. The attempt to make philosophy accessible is refreshing and has opened up a renewed interest in it for me personally
• 
  Craig

  *Goodreads First Reads advanced copy*
  
  The author did a wonderful job bringing these 50 philosophies to a level of explanation where everyone can understand them. He did so in a non-judgemental/non-favoritist way, allowing the reader to decide which makes sense to them and which sounds completely foolish. The way the author presented each philosophy, with a section listing other similar philosophies adds to the readers understanding.
  
  I definitely have a desire to check out some of these classics for myself now. I would recommend 50 Philosophy Classics to anyone interested in an introductory book on some of the most influential philosophies throughout history.
• 
  Osama

  يقدم الكتاب ملخصا جيدا لأشهر خمسين فلسفة عالمية، ويوفر مقدمة عامة ممتعة لمن يرغب بكسر حاجز الرهبة تجاه دراسة الفلسفة.
  From Aristotle, Plato, Epicurus, Confucius, Cicero and Heraclitus in ancient times to 17th century rationalists Descartes, Leibniz and Spinoza, from 20th-century greats Jean-Paul Sartre, Jean Baudrillard and Simone de Beauvoir to contemporary thinkers Michael Sandel, Peter Singer and Slavoj Zize.
• 
  Cav

  "Perhaps the greatest divide in philosophy is between those who believe that all our information must come from the senses (the empirical, materialist view) and those who believe that truth can be arrived at through abstract reasoning (the rationalists and idealists).
  The first camp has a long lineage, from the second-century skeptic Sextus Empiricus to the Englishman Francis Bacon and Scottish Enlightenment thinker David Hume, and to the twentieth-century “logical positivists,” including A.J. Ayer and philosopher of science Karl Popper.
  The second camp counts among its number Plato (his theory of nonphysical “Forms” that undergird the universe), Descartes (his famous separation of mind and matter), and Kant (who resurrected the idea of “moral law” in modern philosophy).
  The purpose of this book is not to tell you who is “right,” but to lay out some of the ideas and theories of note to help you make up your own mind."
  
  Despite the above quote which captured my interest early-on here, this one ended up a bit of a mixed bag for me...
  Author
  Tom Butler-Bowdon is a non-fiction author based in Oxford, England.
  
  Tom Butler-Bowdon:
  
  
  
  
  
  I don't generally like philosophy, and this book didn't really change my experience with it, sadly.
  I went into this one with high hopes. I thought that the short length paid to each of the philosophers covered here might alleviate some of my frustration with this field. It didn't. I almost put this one down multiple times...
  
  My dislike of philosophy aside, 50 Philosophy Classics is formatted well. The book goes through each of the 50 historical philosophers in an alphabetical fashion, spending five or 6 pages on each. This made the material presented easy to absorb.
  
  Despite my best efforts, I just couldn't get past my general dislike of this topic. Unfortunately, most philosophical works I have read tend to be incredibly lengthy, dry and arduous treks of long-winded esoteric navel-gazing. Sadly, despite only dwelling on each of the 50 philosophers presented here for a few pages - much of the writing here fell in line with my previous experiences.
  
  I don't want my personal dislike of this discipline to cause me to give an otherwise good book a bad review. However, I didn't really enjoy the writing here; neither the style, nor the content.
  So, I think I'll give this one a 3-star rating, as I'm sure this book will make a great resource for those who are actually interested in philosophy...
• 
  maria

  Summarises these 50 vital philosophical texts efficiently and with very accessible language, making complex ideas relatively easy to understand. I found it to be a great introduction to the field, and the succinct biographies a nice touch.
• 
  Don Mario

  It really keeps its promise of "insights" and "thinking". Very thought provoking, and good motivation for further reading. I think I'll get back to this book every some time.
• 
  The Conch

  Theologian and philosopher Thomas Aquinas wrote in On the Heavens: “the study of philosophy has as its purpose to know not what people have thought, but rather the truth about the way things are.”
  
  I saw the series of 50 books of author Tom Butler at airport. The attractive point of the 50 series is that it is act like capsule containing 50 globules of knowledge and on swallowing one more access of knowledge will open.
  
  As the name suggests, this book summarizes thoughts of fifty major western and Greek philosophers. However, except Confucius, no other occidental philosophers are given place.
  
  The reader will find him/herself floating in the river of thoughts from ancient philosophers Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Epicurus, Heraclitus etc. to modern Daniel Kahneman, Chomsky, Peter Singer, Taleb and Slavoj Zizek.
• 
  Steve

  A average of 6 pages dedicated to each Philosopher makes for easy reading, especially if you are not familiar with them.
  The first theme of "Discover life's meaning" was enough to draw me to this book. I was not disappointed either.
  
  I like the format of 50 different stories, where I can read a chapter, put the book down and return to it some weeks later, and start another story. Liken it to a short story book.
• 
  Alexandru

  Excellent selection of philosophers and a neutral presentation of various issues tackled by the selected 50. I really appreciated the modern philosopher's analysis, because the classics are already known to me. Another good point is the inclusion of various philosophers with opposable opinions on various issues. A worthy read for sure, even though often people do not like books that have in the title 100 or 50 of the best minds and so on...
  
  My favourite parts that left a deep impact are as follows: the scepticism of A.J. Ayer; the myths of human dignity and character and the influence of situational factors of Julian Baggini; the modern era of plenty of information and lack of meaningful data described by Jean Baudrillard; Henri Bergson's optimism, a new light on Epicurus and his human hedonism, which is different from the modern definition of hedonism (being more of a Stoic it was intersting to see a new insight on hedonism); Michel Foucault relatvism; Harry Frankfurt on bulshiting in this century; Sam Harris on the illusion of free will; Williams James pragmatism; Daniel Kahneman on the importance of psychology in the finding of truth; Nassim Nicholas Taleb on the wanted "mediocristan" vs the real "extremistan"; and finally Zizek and his criticism of the capitalism with the human face and the charity as the price for consumaristic sins.
  
  Do not get me wrong all 50 chapters of the book are worth reading, especially for those that are beginners in philosophy.
• 
  Ozan Gencer

  10 yıldız olsa 10 yıldız verirdim. Okuduğum en kıymetli 4-5 şeyden biriydi diyebilirim. Tek kelimeyle muhteşem.
  
  Çok uzun süreye yayılmış bir okuma oldu. Yavaş okuma yaptığım zaman, bilgiyi çok daha tatmin edici bir şekilde içselleştiriyorum. Bu kadar hayran olmamın sebebi bu da olabilir tabi.
  
• 
  Maddy

  If your interested in Philosophy, and you simply don't know where to start, then I suggest you start here. This book introduces the reader to fifty of the greats in small bite size paragraphs. Each Philosopher gets 5-6 Pages, and in that, is a synopsys of their type of philosophy with a small section called "In a Nutshell" which I found helpful, especially the ones I was not that interested in. It's basically easy access to a subject that most find intimidating and inaccessible.
  Some of my Favourites:
  - Immanuel Kant - My personal favourite
  - Peter Singer - Because he's Alturistic
  - Plato - Classic that never gets old
  - Noam Chomsky - Modern Philosophy/Politics
  - John Locke - A must for everyone
  - John Stuart Mill - On Liberty
  - Aristotle - Happiness, A Meaningful Life
• 
  Ashik Uzzaman

  I finished the audiobook today and overall liked it. I didn't like the fact that the philosophers were presented in the order of their last name. I think it would be very appropriate to order them in terms of their birth or death time to have a sequence how various ideas in philosophy developed over time. Another thing I am not clear is what was the criteria to pick the below 50 philosophers. For example, how come Averroes (Ibn Rush) and his theory of the unit of the intellect did not get a place in this list? Despite that, I think this book is a great start for people who are thinking to get familiar with the history of philosophy.
  
  Below is the list of books covered in 50 Philosophy Classics.
  
  1. Hannah Arendt - The Human Condition (1958)
  2. Aristotle Nicomachean - Ethics (4th century BC)
  3. AJ Ayer - Language, Truth and Logic (1936)
  4. Julian Baggini - The Ego Trick (2011)
  5. Jean Baudrillard - Simulacra and Simulation (1981)
  6. Simone de Beauvoir - The Second Sex (1952)
  7. Jeremy Bentham - Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789)
  8. Henri Bergson - Creative Evolution (1911)
  9. David Bohm - Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980)
  10. Noam Chomsky - Understanding Power (2002)
  11. Cicero - On Duties (44 BC)
  12. Confucius - Analects (5th century BC)
  13. Rene Descartes - Meditations (1641)
  14. Ralph Waldo - Emerson Fate (1860)
  15. Epicurus - Letters (3rd century BC)
  16. Michel Foucault - The Order of Things (1966)
  17. Harry Frankfurt - On Bullshit (2005)
  18. Sam Harris - Free Will (2012)
  19. GWF Hegel - Phenomenology of Spirit (1803)
  20. Martin Heidegger - Being and Time (1927)
  21. Heraclitus - Fragments (6th century)
  22. David Hume - An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748)
  23. William James - Pragmatism (1904)
  24. Daniel Kahneman - Thinking: Fast and Slow (2011)
  25. Immanuel Kant - Critique of Pure Reason (1781)
  26. Søren Kierkegaard - Fear and Trembling (1843)
  27. Saul Kripke - Naming and Necessity (1972)
  28. Thomas Kuhn - The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962)
  29. Gottfried Wilhelm - Leibniz Theodicy (1710)
  30. John Locke - An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690)
  31. Marshall McLuhan - The Medium is the Massage (1967)
  32. Niccolo Machiavelli - The Prince (1532)
  33. John Stuart - Mill On Liberty (1859)
  34. Michel de Montaigne - Essays (1580)
  35. Iris Murdoch - The Sovereignty of Good (1970)
  36. Friedrich Nietzsche - Beyond Good and Evil (1886)
  37. Blaise Pascal - Pensees (1670)
  38. Plato - The Republic (4th century BC)
  39. Karl Popper - The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934)
  40. John Rawls - A Theory of Justice (1971)
  41. Jean-Jacques Rousseau - The Social Contract (1762)
  42. Bertrand Russell - The Conquest of Happiness (1920)
  43. Michael Sandel - Justice (2009)
  44. Jean Paul Sartre - Being and Nothingness (1943)
  45. Arthur Schopenhauer - The World as Will and Representation (1818)
  46. Peter Singer - The Life You Can Save (2009)
  47. Baruch Spinoza - Ethics (1677)
  48. Nassim Nicholas Taleb - The Black Swan (2007)
  49. Ludwig Wittgenstein - Philosophical Investigations (1953)
  50. Slavoj Zizek - Living In The End Times (2010)
  
• 
  Daline Ly

  As a young amateur entering the world of philosophy, I can't stress enough how much this book have helped me wrap my head around, some of the most complex ideas and put it in four pages so eloquently. The world of philosophy can be overwhelming as one is bombarded with many philosophers: where do i even begin? what is my philosophy? who should I know?
  
  Although Bowdon tried to summarize each philosopher's idea in a "nutshell" there are times when i wish it could be further elaborated due to its complexity, nonetheless his writing and explanation makes philosophy accessible for anyone as long as he/she has an interest in this field. Because of how dense the content of this book is, I have spent months reading this book, and there are times when my brain feel completely drained after (definitely worth it though).
• 
  Moira McPartlin

  I am starting to take baby steps into the world of philosophy, but a look at the philosophy shelves in my local bookshop bamboozle me. There is so many different strands, and they all seem to disagree with each other. I found this book in my local library and it saved me. The author has chosen 50 wide ranging books of philosophical works and explains in very accessible language what the books and authors are about. Each chapter begins with some quotes, there is an 'In a nutshell' sentences and also an 'In a similar vein' list to allow you to group the works into their strands. At the end he lisys a further 50 works for consideration. So I now have 100 philosophy books to add to my toppling 'to be read' pile.
• 
  Kanske Svartfors

  I've read quite a few books of this kind that try to convey the ideas of philosophers in a nutshell, and I have to say that this book does it perfectly. The author balances the amount of information on any given philosopher very well: not too little, not too much. Also, the author has the ability to explain complex ideas extremely well.
  
  A lot of times books like this are very frustrating, mostly because they try to morally judge the philosophers they are talking about. Also, most of them are just too academic.
  
  This book is perfect for the purpose it was made for!
  
  6/5 (because it actually succeeds in doing what it set out to do)
• 
  Seth

  A really good way to pick up on all the philosophy classes your education system failed to provide. A good variety of thought, some wacky ideas, a few that really hit the nail on the head. Obviously depending on the reader. A couple of that was so deep you had to just stare at the page whilst you tried to navigate through space and time to come to some remote understanding of what they were on about. All in all a great exploration of thought throughout the history of humankind, just enough to scratch the surface.
• 
  Book Grocer

  
  Purchase 50 Philosophy Classics here for just $12!
  
  This is a fantastic book for anyone who is interested in learning some philosophy but is not quite sure where to start. With his concise summaries of both classical and modern philosophical texts, Tom Butler-Bowdon has taken content that is normally quite difficult to wrap your head around and unpacked it in a way that is accessible and easy to follow.
  
  Leea - The Book Grocer
• 
  Zlati

  I enjoyed this book so much. Concise and to the point concepts from some of the brightest minds in the field. The only thing I wished for was diversity- too much western, not enough world philosophy. For example, no Russian or African thought, very little Eastern and Middle Eastern thought. Nonetheless lovely and efficiently structured read.
• 
  Joshua Lawson

  This is a great overview of some of the major western philosophers from the past 2500 years. I wasn't familiar with all the names but every chapter held my interest. It also struck me for the first time while going through this list how few female philosophers there have been throughout history.
• 
  William Schram

  Contains key points of 50 works of philosophy, organized by the author's last name.
• 
  Philip

  An excellent compendium!
• 
  DanteH

  Same as before, but this one was more to my liking, have it been the way it was written or the complexity of it, I enjoyed it a lot.
• 
  Iacob Cupcea

  Great collections of ideas and bibliography
• 
  Alice Bell

  “And if the man lives who would belittle the study of philosophy, I quite fail to see what in the world he would see fit to praise.” Cicero
  
  Turns out philosophy is pretty hard, whilst also being interesting. The book is written in alphabetical order of authors name but makes more sense read chronologically. Luckily another reviewer had put up a list of the chapters in date order.
  
  So I started with the Greeks which I knew a little bit about both from my own reading and teaching Aristotle’s virtues in RE. And a great way to live your life. Your habits become who you are.
  
  “[We] become builders by building, and we become harpists by playing the harp. Similarly, then, we become just by doing just actions, temperate by doing temperate actions, brave by doing brave actions.”
  
  I found the middle section of the book the most difficult. The scientific philosophers whose focus was on the being and who we are. It all felt a bit irrelevant and navel gazing.
  
  In sum, philosophers are not lovers of wisdom, but lovers of their wisdom. Nietzsche
  
  Bertrand Russell brought a ray of sunshine though with his thoughts on happiness
  
  Happiness comes from throwing ourselves into life, which generally lessens the preoccupation with the self – a primary cause of unhappiness. Russell
  
  And then we moved into more of a focus on political and behavioural philosophies of the modern era and these were very interesting. A particular favourite chapter being Sandel
  
  For Sandel, a “politics of the common good” recognizes the value of citizenship, sacrifice, and service, and knows the moral limits of markets.
  
  But also interesting thoughts from Zizek - Part of the problem of capitalism, Žižek says, is that it has shifted from its “Protestant ethic” roots to become merely a culture of envy and consumerism. Also from Frankfurt on bullshit “Unlike the liar or the honest person, the bullshitter’s eyes are not on the facts at all”
  
  So all in all I’m pleased I’ve read this. Will I remember it all? Absolutely not. But there will be ideas and thoughts that are now in my subconscious that will rise to the surface again in conversations. I’ve already drawn on some of the philosophies in how I think and see situations. I’m sure the effect will be long lasting.
  
  
  
  
  
• 
  George Vernon

  5/10, a nice overview. The author fortunately does not attempt to bend Baudrillard's hyperreality or anything else in the book into yet another unnecessary self-help manual like the title threatens. I did read the fifty sections in chronological order as is necessary to follow the references in each to contemporaries and previous influences. The alphabetical order which the book actually follows is stupid. The selection seems reasonable, which is not to say unimpeachable, to me.
  
  At least twice, the author unironically refers to ideas as left- or right- brained, which is a ridiculously stupid bit of pop-psychology that should have been left in the 1980s. I also spotted one line of biography in the section on Marshall McLuhan (The Mechanical Bride (1951), was an examination of the effect of advertising on society and culture.) which is word-for-word identical to the 2011 (probably earlier still, but I have better things to do in life than chase plagiarised sentences all the way back to their conception) revision of the Marshall McLuhan Wikipedia article.
  
  Those irritations aside, the book is well written and delivers what it promises to be.
• 
  Dr G Bhas

  An interesting introduction to philosophical themes . Essentially insights in a nutshell from the worlds thinkers that expand and diversify our ideosphere on being, truth and existence.
  The author expresses the broad idea in a nutshell with suggestions of ideas in a similar vein with succint expansion of key concepts and the flow of thought
  
  For example if you have wondered
  1) What is the nature of being human?
  2) What is happiness?
  3) How do we understand language and truth?
  4)How do we understand truth in a world of signs and symbols?
  5) What is the concept of the Other
  6)What is a just society
  7)How is reality viewed through life and time?
  8) Is reality fragmented or undivided
  9) What is right and how has these ideas evolved?
  10) What is personhood? What is real
  11)What is value in a belief or idea?
  
  And much more
  Read and reflect . Let our ideosphere expand to the vast questions of life.
• 
  Jay Best

  Decent enough book. Several of the philosophers I am blown away by but many seem to be involved in intellectual mastication. Eg over thinking and making overly elaborate mental models of the world.
  
  I love the Stoics. I love many of the quotes from many philosophers but quite a few just irritate me.
  
  Listened at 2.5x via Libby