Title | : | Aretism: An Ancient Sports Philosophy for the Modern Sports World |
Author | : | |
Rating | : | |
ISBN | : | 0739148818 |
ISBN-10 | : | 9780739148815 |
Language | : | English |
Format Type | : | Hardcover |
Number of Pages | : | 234 |
Publication | : | First published May 31, 2011 |
Holowchak and Reid present Aretism as a tripartite model of athletic excellence focused on personal, civic, and global integration. They reject the personal and social separation characteristics of much of contemporary moral reasoning. Aretism creates a critical and normative framework within which athletic agents can aim for spirited, but morally sensitive, competition by seeking the betterment not only of themselves, through athletic competition, but also of their teammates, fellow competitors, and even their communities.
Holowchak and Reid also present a historical overview of sport and a critique of two traditional models―the martial/commercial model and the aesthetic/recreational model. This book is most applicable to students and academics concerned with the philosophy of sport, but will be of interest to all those in sports professions, including coaches, trainers, and athletes.
Aretism: An Ancient Sports Philosophy for the Modern Sports World Reviews
-
Although the earlier parts of this book intrigued me, by the end I was somewhat disappointed with Aretism. The authors' discussion of sport is overly reductive, as they constantly pound home the theme that a "Martial-Commercial" (MC) model governs sports today and has a variety of harmful effects. The MC model is marked by features like an emphasis upon violence, individualism, winning at all costs, and valuing sports as a means to other ends like fame and money. While there is something to be said for looking at this mentality as part of a larger and more nuanced discussion of contemporary sports, the singular focus on this model neglects the number of people who play sports for enjoyment, recreation, physical conditioning, and many other purposes. In addition, the authors' proposal that the MC model be replaced by their Aretism model seems like pie in the sky, with no clear path to that goal except for unrealistic proposals such as banning violent sports (which, in any case, is a problematic suggestion for a free society).